The
180 spacrats launched in 1965
...
Spacecraft
entries
.
Kosmos 52 / Zenit-2
#25
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-2 11F61 No. 26 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #1 ; 1965-001A ; 480th spacecraft,
968th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Discoverer 87 / KH-4A
16 / CORONA 91
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1016 / CORONA J-18 / OPS
3928 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #2 ; 1965-002A ; 481st spacecraft,
972nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
P-35-10 / DAPP
10
Spacecraft: |
OPS 7040 / DMSP 4A-1 / DMSP-Block-4A
F1
Data Acquisition and Processing Program
Defense Meteorological Satellite Program |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #3 ; 1965-03A ; 482nd spacecraft,
943rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Gemini 2
Spacecraft: |
Gemini spacecraft 2 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #4 ; n/a ; 483rd spacecraft. |
Type: |
Piloted spacecraft test |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
19 January 1965, from Cape Canaveral,
by a Titan 2. |
Orbit: |
Sub-orbital: up to 159 km altitude,
and 3,422.5 km downrange. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
19 January 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: On 10 December
1964, final Gemini unmanned flight test (GT-2) from ETR was postponed after
a last-second engine misfire on the Titan II rocket. The trouble occurred
1.7 seconds after the Titan II booster engines ignited: loss of hydraulic
pressure caused one of the two engine nozzles to swivel out of place; and
automatic system sensed this and immediately extinguished both engines
in the rocket’s first stage one second before lift-off. A NASA spokesman
said that one of the nozzle tubes received a slight crack as a result of
the malfunction and that extensive checking of all systems must be completed
before a decision would be made as to whether the entire first stage would
be replaced.
The Titan II was
to have lifted the 3,130-kg Gemini capsule to 170 km in the suborbital
flight and then accelerated it to faster and hotter reentry than normal.
A parachute landing in the Atlantic was projected for the capsule and recovery
planned. Chief goals of the flight, second in the Gemini series, would
have been to test the heat shield as well as control, life support, and
other systems. NASA said the delay meant the first manned Gemini flight
would not take place until the second quarter of 1965. GT-2 would be attempted
again in January.
An unmanned instrument-packed
Gemini spacecraft (GT-2) was launched in suborbital shot preliminary to
U.S.’s first two-man venture. Aboard was an automatic sequencer which issued
orders at precise times en route to fire the rocket’s second stage, to
separate the spacecraft from the rocket, to jettison the spacecraft’s storage
section, to cartwheel the spacecraft into a reentry attitude, and to open
the spacecraft’s parachutes. The rocket reached a maximum altitude of 159
km and a speed of 26,885 km/h before impacting 3,422.5 km downrange. The
Gemini spacecraft descended by parachute into the Atlantic 24.75 km short
of the planned impact point and 84 km from the carrier U.S.S. Lake Champlain
which recovered the capsule an hour and 45 min. after launch.
The capsule was
reported in excellent condition. Major experiments for which the test was
intended were apparently complete successes: a test of the heat shield;
a test of the retrorocket system; and a test of the sequencing system.
Despite its successes, the test had some difficulties: a fuel cell that
would be the primary electrical system in the spacecraft during long-duration
manned flights failed to operate before launching because of a stuck valve;
the temperature was found to be too high in the cooling system of the spacecraft.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 17 August 1964, lightning damaged certain
electrical systems in Titan II launch vehicle and ground checkout equipment
at Cape Kennedy, where the boosier rocket was being prepared for launching
of unmanned Gemini spacecraft (GT-2). NASA spokesman said: “The over-all
effect of this condition may result in a delay of the first manned flight
[GT-3] into next year.”
On 27 August 1964,
hurricane Cleo battered Cape Kennedy rocket launching site with gale winds
up to105 km/h. Technicians dismantled second stage of Titan II for GT-2
Gemini flight and stored it in hangar, lashed first stage of the Titan
II to the pad. No damage was done to the Titan II or other lashed-down
rockets. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1964, p. 289, 297, 413-4 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 21-2 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
MTV 1
Spacecraft: |
ABRES MTV-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #5 ; 1965 1st loss ; 484th spacecraft. |
Type: |
[Technology?] |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
21 January 1965 at 21h34 UTC,
from Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-576-B3, by an Atlas Satar (1, Atlas
D OV-1). |
Orbit: |
N/a |
Destroyed: |
21 January 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: “USAF launched
a 45 kg ARV (Aerospace Research Vehicle) satellite pickaback aboard an
Atlas ICBM from Vandenberg AFB, Calif. The satellite, carrying instrumentation
to sample radiation and micrometeoroids, was the first to be sent toward
westward orbit around the Earth. Satellite Situation Report for
January 31, 1965, did not indicate that the satellite had achieved orbit.”
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 24 (Not reported in Annexe 1) ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
OV1-1
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #6 ; 1965 2nd loss ; 485th spacecraft. |
Type: |
[Science & Technology] |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
21 January 1965 at 21h34 UTC,
from Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-576-B3, by an Atlas Satar (1, Atlas
D OV-1). |
Orbit: |
N/a |
Destroyed: |
21 January 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: x
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 9 November 1964, UPI reported that the
Air Force would attempt pickaback launch of a secret satellite (OV-1) in
December 1964 with hopes of proving a method which would save the taxpayers
$370,000 per launch. The 135 kg satellite, carrying its own rocket motor,
would ride into space on the side of an Atlas missile making a re-entry
test. Near the peak of the Atlas’ flight, OV-1 would spring away, coast
for a few seconds, and be launched into orbit by its own rocket. The Atlas
would continue on its mission. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's
Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, (not reported) ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics, 1964, p. 383 ; TRW Space Log ; TRW Space Log 1996
(Vol. 32), p. 88 ; Gunter's
; Celestrak's Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Tiros 9
Spacecraft: |
Tiros I (A-54) |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #7 ; 1965-004A ; 486th spacecraft,
978th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorology |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
22 January 1965 at 7h52 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-17A, by a Delta DSV-3C (Thor Delta C 374 / Delta
28). |
Orbit: |
685 km x 2,578 km x 81.6°
x 119 min min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: TIROS IX was successfully
injected into a polar orbit, but the spacecraft was to have gone into a
circular orbit about740 km above the Earth, however, the second stage of
Delta burned 11 sec. too long and pushed TIROS IX into an elliptical orbit
of 685 km by 2,578 km. First NASA attempt to place a satellite in near-polar
sun-synchronous orbit. A hat-box shaped structure, TIROS IX was an 18-sided
polygon, 56-cm high, 107 cm in diameter, weighing 138 kg, with one of its
flat sides facing Earth when initially injected into orbit. Ground signals
to the control system tipped the craft up 90° so that it assumed the
appearance of a fat wheel rolling on a track around the Earth. Two cameras
were placed on the perimeter opposite each other so that as the wheel rolled
at 10 rpm, each camera, in turn, would roll into position and snap a picture,
triggered by an infrared horizon sensor. The combination of TIROS IX’s
polar orbit and rolling wheel was expected to provide 100% photographic
coverage of the Earth's cloud cover during daylight hours. Primary purpose
of the TIROS IX launching was to test the new cartwheel concept as a forerunner
of a joint NASA-Weather Bureau Tiros Operational System (TOS) of weather
satellites.
One of TIROS IX’s
two cameras had stopped returning useful photographs, NASA announced on
5 April 1965, possibly because of malfunction of a diode. Second camera
was taking about 250 pictures daily of the Earth’s cover. The “cartwheel
satellite,” so called because it was moving through space like a rolling
wheel with the cameras mounted opposite each other on the perimeter, had
taken more than 32,000 pictures, 92% of them useful to weather forecasters.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 25-26, 168-9, 576 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
KH-7 15 / Gambit-1 15
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 15 / GAMBIT SV 965 /
OPS 4703; AFP-206 SV 965 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #8 ; 1965-005A ; 487th spacecraft,
980th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 53
Spacecraft: |
DS-A1 No. 5 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #9 ; 1965-006A ; 488th spacecraft,
983rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Military Earth upper atmosphere studies &
technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
OSO 2
Spacecraft: |
OSO B2 (S-17) |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #10 ; 1965-007A ; 489th spacecraft,
987th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Solar observatory |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
3 February 1965 at 16h36 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-17B, by a Delta DSV-3C (Thor Delta C 411 / Delta
29). |
Orbit: |
552 km x 632 km x 33° x 97
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
9 August 1989. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: OSO 2 (OSO-B2),
the 234-kg Orbiting Solar Observatory, is the second of eight spacecraft
planned by NASA for direct observations of the Sun. It carried eight scientific
experiments and has two main section: the wheel (lower) section provided
stability by gyroscopic spinning and housed the telemetry, command, batteries,
control electronics and gas spin-control arms, and five experiment packages;
the sail (upper) section was oriented toward the Sun and contained solar
cells and solar pointing experiments. For the first time, the instruments,
controlled by ground command, would scan the entire solar surface. OSO
2 experiments were intended to map the frequency and energy of solar emissions
and represent a joint Government-university–industry effort. NASA Goddard
Space Flight Center managed the project. This spacecraft included parts
salvage from the OSO B damaged in April 1964 prior to launch (see below)
and components of a spacecraft built for prototype testing.
Six of eight Sun-study
experiments functioned well, but OSO II did not achieved all its primary
objectives. Satellite was turned off in November 1965 after exceeding its
lifetime expectancy by 50% and returning some 9.2 billion bits of data.
After a month in
orbit, OSO II had returned about 11 km of tape-recorded data. The satellite
was functioning normally, except for failure of the ultraviolet scanning
spectrometer and for sporadic return of data from the spectro-heliograph
portion of its coronagraph. Earlier problems with data transmissions from
the ultraviolet spectrometer had been resolved.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
ON 14 April 1964, a Delta rocket’s third-stage
motor (X-248) inexplicably ignited in checkout building at Cape Kennedy,
burning 11 engineers and technicians, three critically. The rocket stage
had just been mated with Orbiting Solar Observatcry (OSO) in reparation
for prelaunch spin testing, when the motor suddenly ignited, rose from
the alignment stand, hit the ceiling, knocking off the OSO, and landed
in a far corner. USAF said this was the “first serious incident of its
kind in 14 years of operations and over 1,400 missile launchings” at the
Cape. Two technicians later succumbed to burns sustained in the accident. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; National Space Science
Data Center's ; Astronautical
Events of 1964, p. 135, 141 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 53, 62, 106-7, 576 ; TRW Space Log 1996
(Vol. 32), p. 88 ; Gunter's
;
Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Transtage 3
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #11 ; 1965-008A ; 490th spacecraft,
1,001st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
11 February 1965 at 15h19 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-20, by a Titan 3A (3A-3). |
Orbit: |
Initial: 174 km x 196 km
Later: 187 km x 2,840 km
Final: 1,769 km x 2.795 km x 32.15°
x 145.6 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: USAF Titan III-A
rocket hurled its third stage (transtage) and two satellites into orbit
in a maneuverability test involving three different orbits. Primary goal
of the mission was triple ignition of the transtage’s engine. First firing,
about five minutes after launch, injected the 3-ton rocket-payload assembly
into an orbit of 196 km apogee and 174 km perigee. After traveling once
around the Earth, during which the rocket performed a deliberate somersault.
the transtage ignited again, burned 37 sec., and shifted the rocket into
an elliptical orbit of 2,840 km apogee and 187 km perigee. During one and
one half orbits around the Earth, the rocket performed a second deliberate
somersault; a third firing put it in circular orbit with an apogee of 2.795
km; perigee; 1,769 km; period, 145.6 min.; and inclination, 32.15°.
The transtage then ejected LES I and a 450-kg metal
chunk to demonstrate its ability to launch more than one payload.
Transtage performed
well, demonstrating by triple ignition of motors, the ability to change
orbit several times and also multiple satellite ejection. Payload weight:
5,200 kg, including 3,000 kg transtage and 485 kg of truss ballast.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
In July 1964, it was reported that nine payloads
had been chosen for flight aboard the research and development launchs
of the USAF Titan III. Five of the experiments were said to be experimental
communications satellites built by the MIT Lincoln Laboratory, and the
sixth a backup communications satellite from Lincoln Lab. The remaining
three were scientific satellites using the modified Arents spacecraft shell.
To avoid confusion with the defunct Arents program, the latter spacecraft
were to be called Orbiting Vehicle 2 (OV-2). |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics, 1964, p. 269 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 64-65, 577 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ;; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32),
p. 88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
LES 1
Spacecraft: |
LES stands for Lincoln Experimental
Satellite |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #12 ; 1965-008C ; 491st spacecraft,
1,002nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
11 February 1965 at 15h19 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-20, by a Titan 3A (3A-3). |
Orbit: |
2,771 km x 2,800 km x 32.15°
x 145.7 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: LES 1 was a 31-kg
experimental communications satellite which had been built by MIT’s Lincoln
Laboratory to test advanced components, materials, and techniques which
might apply to future communications satellites. Radio signals were to
be exchanged between the satellite and ground stations. LES I was to have
fired a solid-propellant motor to move to an elliptical orbit with an apogee
of 18,500 km and a perigee of 2,775 km, but the motor failed to fire. The
spacecraft continued to orbit near the transtage and the metal chunk.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 64-65, 577 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos
Spacecraft: |
DS-P1-Yu No. 2 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #13 ; 1965 3rd loss ; 492nd
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Military technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Pegasus 1
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #14 ; 1965-009A ; 493rd spacecraft,
1,085th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Micrometeroids research |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
16 February 1965 at 14h37 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-37B, by a Saturn I (SA-9). |
Orbit: |
496 km x 745 km x 31.7°x
97 min.
496 km x 743 km x 31.7° x 97 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
13 September 1978. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: After the 1,450-kg
Pegasus I meteoroid detection satellite was orbited achieved, a motor-driven
device extended wing-like panels on the Pegasus satellite to a span of
29 metres. Each wing consisted of seven frames hinged together and made
up of 208 panels. Pegasus I remained attached to Saturn 1’s second stage
as planned. A television camera, mounted on the interior of the service
module adapter, provided pictures of the satellite deploying in space.
Pegasus I exposed
more than 200 suare metres of instrumented surface. with thicknesses varying
up to 4 mm. As meteoroid particles collided with the surface of the panels.
they would be registered electronically and reported to Earth. Exposure
of the large panel area over a long period would give designers of manned
and unmanned spacecraft a good sample of meteoroid data. Pegasus I would
be visible from the earth without the aid of telescope on clear nights.
On 27 February 1965,
it was reported that Pegasus I was functioning normally and recording information
to ground stations on the size and frequency of meteoroid “strikes” or
impacts on all three sensor panel groups. Scientists at NASA Marshall Space
Flight Center said the numher of penetrations of the panels was not greatly
different from the expected level. Pegasus I had a wing-like structure
29.3 metres long and 4.2 metres in width, offering more than 215 square
metres of area instrumented to detect collisions with meteoritic particles.
The basic information on the penetrating power and frequency of meteoroids
was needed for the design of future spacecraft. In addition, data on temperature,
power levels, and the intensity of radiation were being received. The latter
were also as predicted.
Pegasus had 29-meter
(when unfolded in orbit) wings composed of electrically charged panels
sensitive to meteoroid hits, affixed to the 12.5-metre-long S-IV 2nd stage
of the Saturn launch vehicle.
SA-9 Mission objectives:
study distribution, size, and velocity of meteoroids in near-Earth orbit,
and continue development of Saturn I launch vehicle. Total weight carried
into orbit: 15,000 kg.; 1,450 kg Petasus + 9,000 kg S-IV 2nd stage + 4,500
kg Apollo CSM.
SA-9 launcher performed
excellently, marking 8th successful Saturn I flight in 8 attempts. Boilerplate
Apollo separated from S-IV stage on schedule. Pegasus I then deployed
its wings. By September 1965, it had recorded meteoroid hit rates of 44
per square meter per years.
On 16 May 1965,
it was reported that Pegasus I continued to transmit useful information
after months of operation in the space environment. It was first
of a series of three satellites intended to measure meteoroid penetrations
of greater structural thicknesses and contained a meteoroid penetration
area of almost 215 sq. m. Although useful results had been obtained with
3.8-mm-thick panels, the data obtained with 20-mm-thick and 40-mm-thick
panels had not been fully satisfactory because of difficulties in the operation
of the detection system. Still, Pegasus I had provided significant information
leading to improvement of detection systems on the remaining two Pegasus
spacecraft.
Meteoroids probably
would not be unduly hazardous to spacecraft flying for short periods in
the near-Earth environment, a NASA report indicated on 12 August 1965,
based on data from Explorer’s XVI and XXIII and Pegasus I and II.Pegasus
I carried three thicknesses of panels but mechanical malfunctions had destroyed
the usefulness of data on the .008- and .016-in.-thick panels; 104 penetrations
had been reported from the .OO15-in.-thick panels.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 71-2 94, 106, 233-4, 376, 577 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Apollo BP-16 (Saturn
SA-9)
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #15 ; 1965-009B ; 494th spacecraft. |
Type: |
Piloted spacecraft text |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
16 February 1965 at 14h37 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-37B, by a Saturn I (SA-9). |
Orbit: |
496 km x 745 km x 31.7°x
97 min.
497 km x 729 km x 31.76° x 97.1
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: Saturn I (SA-9)
two-stage launch vehicle orbited a 15-ton multiple payload, of which 1,450
kg was the Pegasus I meteoroid detection satellite and the 4,500-kg Apollo
boilerplate Command and Service Modules. This was the eighth successful
test in eight flights for Saturn I, and Pegasus I was the first active
payload launched in the Saturn tests.
At launch, an Apollo
command and service module boilerplate (BP-16) and launch escape system
(LES) tower were atop Saturn I, with Pegasus I folded inside the service
module. After first-stage separation and second-stage ignition, LES was
jettisoned. When second stage (S-IV) attained orbit, the Apollo boilerplate
were jettisoned into a separate orbit.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 71-2, 577 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Ranger 8
Spacecraft: |
RA-8 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #16 ; 1965-010A ; 495th spacecraft,
1,086th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
17 February 1965 at 17h05 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-12, by an Atlas-Agena B (Atlas LV-3A 196D / Agena
B 6006). |
Orbit: |
Impacted on Moon. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Crashed on the Moon: |
20 February 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: The 366.5-kg Ranger
VIII spacecraft, equipped with six television cameras to photograph part
of the moon’s surface, was successfully launched. Tracking calculations
showed that the path of the probe would miss the edge of the Moon by only
1,828 km, well within the correction capability. The projected impact area
was the Sea of Tranquility, a dark area relatively free of crater rays,
near the shadow line on the three-quarter moon. Lower-angle lighting was
expected to give more contrast and better definition of detail than was
in the photographs made by Ranger
VII.
On 20 February 1965,
Ranger VIII struck its target on the Moon at 4:57:36.8 EST, after radioing
to Earth about 7,000 close-up pictures of the lunar surface during the
last 23 minutes of flight. The point of impact was 2.59° North latitude,
24.77° East longitude, in the Sea of Tranquillity, an area slightly
east-northeast of the center of a full moon. The spacecraft impacted at
slightly less than 9,500 km/h. Total distance of travel along its trajectory
from lift-off had been calculated as 400,265 km. Accuracy of the shot was
reflected in the fact that impact had been planned for 4:57:30, and at
3° North latitude and 24° East longitude.
Ranger VIII had been programed to execute
a “terminal sequence” just before impact to point the six TV cameras more
in the direction of flight; this sequence was omitted to allow the cameras
to cover a larger area than planned and to provide greater continuity with
the pictures transmitted by Ranger VII. A second change in the flight was
to turn on cameras 23 minutes before impact instead of 13 minutes and 40
seconds. as planned. The new time had been chosen so that initial pictures
would be about equal to Earth-based resolution and then continue into impact.
Dr. Gerard P. Kuiper,
of the University of Arizona, heading the panel for scientific evaluation
of Ranger VIII photographs, said at a press conference shortly after impact
that one of the most important results of this flight had been the discovery
that the Sea of Clouds and the Sea of Tranquillity were similar in structure.
He noted several “odd depressed regions” and said that they could be areas
where collapse had occurred, which might suggest the presence of lava fields.
He believed the lunar surface was composed of very light, frothy material
such as would be formed when rock was melted and allowed to resolidify
within a high vacuum, like that on the Moon. The material envisioned by
Dr. Kuiper might be considered similar to certain volcanic rocks found
on earth: while it would probably be lighter than water, it could still
have substantial strength. This theory was based on laboratory attempts
several years ago to simulate conditions existing when the moon was formed.
Ewen A. Whitaker of the University of Arizona said he felt the lunar material,
which he thought had a consistency of crunchy snow, would support a manned
spacecraft. He said color lines and sharp boundaries tended to show that
the surface was some sort of frothy, lava-like material and definitely
not dust. Another member of the Panel,
Mission objective
of the 367-kg Ranger VIII: by means of close-in photography, contribute
to scientific understanding of lunar surface and support Surveyor and Apollo
soft-lunar-landing programs. The spacecraft was 4.5-metre wide and 3.15-metre
tall (cruise position, with solar panels extended) add contains mid-course
motor, retro-rocket, 1 radio receiver and 3 transmitters, telemetry system,
4 batteries, 6 TV cameras, 9,793 solar cells, 2 antennas, and attitude-control
system. Ranger VIII transmitted some 7,000 close-up photos of the
Moon’s maria before impacting on the Sea of Tranquillity on 20 February
1965, after excellent flight. Photo time was last 23 minutes of flight
(compared with last 17 minutes for Ranger VII), to provide photos from
far enough above the Moon’s surface to be comparable to ones obtainable
from Earth. Results indicated the Sea of Tranquillity was similar in structure
to Sea of Clouds phoographed by Ranger VII, suggested surface had consistency
of crunchy snow.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
New York Times continued its editorial
opposition to the national objective for Project Apollo of landing a man
on the Moon in this decade. On 19 February 1965, an editorial drew from
the two successful major launchings of the week (Ranger VIII and Saturn
I SA-9), the lesson that the kinds of experiments on these flights (lunar
photography of Ranger VIII and Pegasus I micrometeoroid detection satellite
on Saturn I) proved there were many unmeasured perils in space and that
“In the face of these uncertainties, the American space program ought to
retain maximum flexibility of timing, rather than try at all costs to achieve
the artificial goal of a manned lunar landing by 1970.”
On 22 February 1965,
following the successful conclusion of the Ranger VIII lunar photography
mission, another editorial praised the accomplishment, then noted that
the Ranger series was not providing all of the answers to lunar questions
critical to the Apollo program, and concluded: “The two successful Ranger
shots, however, make clear that much valuable information can be gathered
about the Earth’s natural satellite by relatively cheap instrument-carrying
rockets that do not risk human lives. This demonstration, and the continuing
uncertainties about matters essential for a safe manned round trip to the
moon, strengthen still more the case for making progress slowly, without
any arbitrary deadline, on Project Apollo.” |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology
; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 73-4, 78-9, 84-5, 97, 578 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos
Spacecraft: |
DS-A1 No. 6 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #17 ; 1965 4th loss ; 496th
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Military Earth upper atmosphere studies &
technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 54
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #18 ; 1965-011A ; 497th spacecraft,
1,089th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 55
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #19 ; 1965-011B ; 498th spacecraft,
1,050th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 56
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #20 ; 1965-011C ; 499th spacecraft,
1,91th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 57
Spacecraft: |
Voskhod 3KD No. 1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #21 ; 1965-012A ; 500th spacecraft,
1,093th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Piloted spaceship test |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
Launch: |
22 February 1965 at 7h41 UTC,
from Baykonur Cosmodrome, by an A-2/"Voskhod" (11A57). |
Orbit: |
175 km x 512 km x 64°46’
x 91.1 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Recovered: |
22 February 1965 |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Cosmos LVII satellite
was launched by the U.S.S.R. TASS said the satellite carried scientific
apparatus “intended for the further investigation of outer space.” Equipment
was functioning normally. Many U.S. officials suspected that Cosmos LVII
had strayed from its programed flight path and been deliberately destroyed
the day after it was launched. The alleged reason was to prevent the satellite
from falling into foreign hands. U.S. officials were said to have assumed
that Cosmos LVII was a trial run for Voskhod II flight because of similar
orbits. According to a Goddard Space Flight Center’s Satellite Situation
Report, 51 pieces of the satellite were in orbit on 28 February and
39 pieces on 15 Mach 1965. According to GSFC’s 31 March 1965 Satellite
Situation Report, all but six of the 170 pieces into which Cosmos LVII
had shattered after being orbited had fallen to earth.
Officially: continuation
of Cosmos scientific satellite series. Reentered on 22 February 1965. Accompanying
vehicle disintegrated into more than 160 fragments, the last of which had
reentered by 28 March 1965.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 14 December 1964, Dr. Eugene Konecci,
of the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Council staff, told that there
had been no mention of airlocks in public or private discussions of the
Vostok and Voskhod spacecraft, and no other indications of plans for extravehicular
operations. Although the Soviets were aiming at rendezvous, this was expected
to be strictly a vehicle maneuver. “Soviet interest in the use of helium-oxygen
atmospheres for long-term space vehicles may indicate that they do not
have capability for extra-vehicular experimentation,” said Dr. Konecci.
On 15 December 1964,
Dr. Eugene B. Konecci said: “I really do not believe at this time that
[the Soviets] will attempt manned extravehicular experiments until (1)
they have a better space suit, which they appear to be working on; (2)
that they have a better fix on the poszible decompression sickness (bends
or dysbarism) problems of decompressing from a sea-level atmosphere with
nitrogen to a compatible space suit environment; and (3) until we perform
the Gemini intentional decompression and extravehicular experiments.” |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics, 1964, p. 419, 421 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 86, 124-5, 159, 578 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Discoverer 88 / KH-4A
17 / CORONA 92
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1017 / CORONA J-14 / OPS
4782 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #22 ; 1965-013A ; 501st spacecraft,
1,096th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 58
Spacecraft: |
Meteor No. 2 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #23 ; 1965-014A ; 502nd spacecraft,
1,097th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorology |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union |
|
|
|
.
AC-5 / Atlas-Centaur
5
Spacecraft: |
Centaur AC-5 / Centaur 6C |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #24 ; 1965 5th loss ; 503th
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
2 March 1965 at 13h25 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-36A, by an Atlas Centaur (Atlas LV-3C AC-5 / Centaur
D 156D). |
Orbit: |
N/a |
Destroyed: |
2 March 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Two seconds after
lift-off, NASA’s Atlas-Centaur 5, carrying a dummy Surveyor spacecraft,
exploded and burned on Launch Pad 36B at Cape Kennedy. Failure occurred
when two of the three Atlas engines shut off simultaneously due to closing
of a fuel-line valve. The 150-ton, 33-metre rocket rose one metre from
the pad, then fell back to the ground and exploded. Although burning propellant
covered most of the launch complex, no injuries to personnel were reported.
Damage to the launching pad was estimated at $5 million. Objectives of
the Atlas-Centaur test had been to test the ability of its guidance system
and hydrogen-powered second stage to send a payload the size of the 567
kg Surveyor on a precise path to the Moon and to evaluate how well the
mock-up Surveyor spacecraft would withstand the stresses of launching.
Launching pad damage
caused by the Mar. 2 explosion of an Atlas- Centaur rocket at Cape Kennedy
amounted to $2 million and would take three to four months to repair, NASA
reported. To avoid delay in the Atlas-Centaur launching scheduled for mid-summer,
NASA was speeding completion of a new launching pad that was 90% completed
and that could be ready in two months.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 103-4, 120 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
88 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
FOBS 0
Spacecraft: |
OGCh |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #25 ; suborbital ; 504th spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Fractional Orbital Bombardment System |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
5 Mach 1965, from Baykonur Cosmodrome's
LC-67, by a R-36-0. |
Orbit: |
n/a |
Decayed: |
n/a |
Mission: |
Historical reports: x
* * * * *
Current overview: Second stage propellant
leak led to a fire in the silo, that broke out during fuelling. The rocket
exploded, seriously damaging the launch pad at Area 67. |
Source: |
Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's R-36-0
: |
R |
|
.
Kosmos 59 / Zenit-4
#5
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 11 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #26 ; 1965-015A ; 505th spacecraft,
1,191th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Greb VI / Grab 6 / Solrad
6B
Spacecraft: |
NRL PL 142 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #27 ; 1965-016A ; 506th spacecraft,
1,271st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Electronic intelligence |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy & U.S. Army |
|
|
Launch: |
9 March 1965 at 18h29 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-2, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2A 419 /
Agena D SS-01A 2701). |
Orbit: |
904 km x 941 km x 70.06°
x 103.5 min.
903 km x 942 km x 70° |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Thor-Agena D
orbited eight military satellites, the most in any single launch to date.
Two satellites would measure solar radiation (GREB VI and SOLRAD); two
would test stabilization methods for future spacecraft (GGSE II and GGSE
III); one would be used in geodesy (SECOR III); two would help calibrate
satellite tracking networks (SURCAL satellites); and one would transmit
radio broadcasts for ham operators (OSCAR III).
On 19 May 1965,
NASA disclosed that U.S. launched eight military satellites March 9; these
satellites had been unidentified until NASA listed them in its periodic
satellite summary. This was the greatest number of payloads the U.S.
had ever orbited with a single launch vehicle and was believed to exceed
any multiple launching made by the Soviet Union. (A&A, 1966)
On 19 May 1965,
NASA disclosed in its periodic satellite summary that two payloads would
measure solar radiation.
Official mission
objective: develop spaceflight techniques and technology. Greb VI
payload: instruments for measurement of solar radiation, telemetry. (GSFC’s
31 March 1965 Satellite Situation Report disclosure that “a U.S.
satellite orbited March 9 from WTR was orbiting in eight pieces, four of
which were transmitting signals.”)
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 114, 159, 238, 579 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
GGSE 2
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #28 ; 1965-016B ; 507th spacecraft,
1,244th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy & U.S. Army |
|
|
Launch: |
9 March 1965 at 18h29 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-2, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2A 419 /
Agena D SS-01A 2701). |
Orbit: |
907 km x 938 km x 70.08°
x 103.5 min.
903 km x 942 km x 70° |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Thor-Agena D
orbited eight military satellites, the most in any single launch to date.
Two satellites would measure solar radiation (GREB VI and SOLRAD); two
would test stabilization methods for future spacecraft (GGSE II and GGSE
III); one would be used in geodesy (SECOR III); two would help calibrate
satellite tracking networks (SURCAL satellites); and one would transmit
radio broadcasts for ham operators (OSCAR III). (A&A, 1966)
On 19 May 1965,
NASA disclosed in its periodic satellite summary that two payloads would
test stabilization methods for future spacecraft.
Official mission
objective: develop spaceflight techniques and technology. GGSE II payload:
gravity gradient stabilization experiments.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 114, 238, 579 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
GGSE 3
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #29 ; 1965-016C ; 508th spacecraft,
1,292nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy & U.S. Army |
|
|
Launch: |
9 March 1965 at 18h29 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-2, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2A 419 /
Agena D SS-01A 2701). |
Orbit: |
907 km x 936 km x 70.06°
x 103.5 min.
903 km x 942 km x 70° |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Thor-Agena D
orbited eight military satellites, the most in any single launch to date.
Two satellites would measure solar radiation (GREB VI and SOLRAD); two
would test stabilization methods for future spacecraft (GGSE II and GGSE
III); one would be used in geodesy (SECOR III); two would help calibrate
satellite tracking networks (SURCAL satellites); and one would transmit
radio broadcasts for ham operators (OSCAR III).
On 19 May 1965,
NASA disclosed in its periodic satellite summary that two payloads would
test stabilization methods for future spacecraft.
Official mission
objective: develop spaceflight techniques and technology. GGSE III payload:
Gravity gradient stabilization experiments. (A&A, 1966)
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 114, 238, 579 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Solrad 7B
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #30 ; 1965-016B ; 509th spacecraft,
1291st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Solar radioation monitoring |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy & U.S. Army |
|
|
Launch: |
9 March 1965 at 18h29 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-2, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2A 419 /
Agena D SS-01A 2701). |
Orbit: |
907 km x 938 km x 70.08°
x 103.5 min.
903 km x 942 km x 70° |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Thor-Agena D
orbited eight military satellites, the most in any single launch to date.
Two satellites would measure solar radiation (GREB VI and SOLRAD); two
would test stabilization methods for future spacecraft (GGSE II and GGSE
III); one would be used in geodesy (SECOR III); two would help calibrate
satellite tracking networks (SURCAL satellites); and one would transmit
radio broadcasts for ham operators (OSCAR III).
On 19 May 1965,
NASA disclosed in its periodic satellite summary that two payloads would
measure solar radiation.
Official mission
objective: develop spaceflight techniques and technology. SOLRAD payload:
Instruments for measurement of solar radiation.(A&A, 1966)
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 114, 238, 579 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Secor 3 / EGRS 3
Spacecraft: |
SEquential COllation of Range |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #31 ; 1965-016E ; 510th spacecraft,
1,208th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Geodesy |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy & U.S. Army |
|
|
Launch: |
9 March 1965 at 18h29 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-2, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2A 419 /
Agena D SS-01A 2701). |
Orbit: |
906 km x 938 km x 70.11°
x 103.5 min.
903 km x 942 km x 70° |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Thor-Agena D
orbited eight military satellites, the most in any single launch to date.
Two satellites would measure solar radiation (GREB VI and SOLRAD); two
would test stabilization methods for future spacecraft (GGSE II and GGSE
III); one would be used in geodesy (SECOR III); two would help calibrate
satellite tracking networks (SURCAL satellites); and one would transmit
radio broadcasts for ham operators (OSCAR III).
Official mission
objective: develop spaceflight techniques and technology. SECOR III payload:
geodetic satellite.
On 31 March 1965,
U.S. Army disclosed it had orbited a three-satellite earth-mapping system,
with two of the spacecraft circling the earth from west to east and the
third traveling from pole to pole. The satellites were of the Secor type.
Two were fired into orbit earlier this month; the other was launched Jan.
11, 1964. The three spacecraft, each with a radio receiver and transmitter,
were helping pinpoint locations on earth that were widely separated by
large bodies of water.
On 19 May 1965,
NASA disclosed in its periodic satellite summary that one payload would
map the Earth’s surface.(A&A, 1966)
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's
Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 114, 158, 238, 579 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
OSCAR III
Spacecraft: |
Oscar stands of Orbiting Satellite
Carrying Amateur Radio. |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #32 ; 1965-016F ; 511th spacecraft,
1,293rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (radio amateur) |
Sponsor: |
Radio-amateurs |
|
|
Launch: |
9 March 1965 at 18h29 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-2, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2A 419 /
Agena D SS-01A 2701). |
Orbit: |
907 km x 938 km x 70.08°
x 103.5 min.
903 km x 942 km x 70° |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Thor-Agena D
orbited eight military satellites, the most in any single launch to date.
Two satellites would measure solar radiation (GREB VI and SOLRAD); two
would test stabilization methods for future spacecraft (GGSE II and GGSE
III); one would be used in geodesy (SECOR III); two would help calibrate
satellite tracking networks (SURCAL satellites); and one would transmit
radio broadcasts for ham operators (OSCAR III). OSCAR III would transmit
signals from 25 amateur radio channels over a 6,000 km radius and was being
tracked by ham radio operators at Foothill Jr. College, Calif. Amateur
tracking stations in 30 foreign countries were informally participating
in the project.
OSCAR III was a
15-kg amateur radio communication satellite. Oscar would broadcast on frequencies
that amateur radio operators could track. (A&A, 1966)
* * * * *
Current overview: OSCAR III was the first
true amateur satellite relaying voice contacts in the VHF 2 meter band.
It was also the first amateur satellite to operate from solar power and
relay signals from Earth. Its transponder lasted 18 days. More than 1000
amateurs in 22 countries communicated through the linear transponder. The
two beacon transmitters continued operating for several months. Weight
16.3 kg. |
Source: |
A
Brief History of Amateur Satellites ; Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 114, 238, 579 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Surcal 4
Spacecraft: |
Surveillance Calibration |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #33 ; 1965-016G ; 512th spacecraft,
1,310th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Radar calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
9 March 1965 at 18h29 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-2, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2A 419 /
Agena D SS-01A 2701). |
Orbit: |
907 km x 938 x 70.08° x 103.5
min.
903 km x 942 km x 70° |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
27 March 1981. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Thor-Agena D
orbited eight military satellites, the most in any single launch to date.
Two satellites would measure solar radiation (GREB VI and SOLRAD); two
would test stabilization methods for future spacecraft (GGSE II and GGSE
III); one would be used in geodesy (SECOR III); two would help calibrate
satellite tracking networks (SURCAL satellites); and one would transmit
radio broadcasts for ham operators (OSCAR III).
Official mission
objective: develop spaceflight techniques and technology. SURCAL was a
calibration satellite for Spasur tracking system.
On 19 May 1965,
NASA disclosed in its periodic satellite summary that one payload, Surcal
(Space Surveillance Calibration), would help improve precision of satellite
tracking networks.(A&A, 1966)
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 114, 238, 579 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Dodecapole I / Dodecahodron
/ Porcupine 1
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #34 ; 1965-016H ; 513th spacecraft,
1,272th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology ("Surveillance calibration") |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy & U.S. Army |
|
|
Launch: |
9 March 1965 at 18h29 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-2, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2A 419 /
Agena D SS-01A 2701). |
Orbit: |
904 km x 941 km x 70.08°
x 103.5 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Thor-Agena D
orbited eight military satellites, the most in any single launch to date.
Two satellites would measure solar radiation (GREB VI and SOLRAD); two
would test stabilization methods for future spacecraft (GGSE II and GGSE
III); one would be used in geodesy (SECOR III); two would help calibrate
satellite tracking networks (SURCAL satellites); and one would transmit
radio broadcasts for ham operators (OSCAR III).
Official mission objective:
develop spaceflight techniques and technology. SURCAL was a calibration
satellite for Spasur tracking system.
(A&A, 1966)
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 114, 579 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Transit O-3 / NNS O-3
Spacecraft: |
OPS 7087 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #35 ; 1965-017A ; 514th spacecraft,
1,303rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Navigation |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Secor 2
Spacecraft: |
Sequential Collation of Range |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #36 ; 1965-017B ; 515th spacecraft,
1,250th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Geodesy |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
Launch: |
11 March 1965 at 13h39 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-1-1, by a Thor-Able-Star (Thor Ablestar
440 AB018). |
Orbit: |
285 km x 1,033 km x 89.99°
x 97.9 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
26 February 1968. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Historical
reports: USAF launched Thor-Able-Star booster , placing in orbit an
unidentified satellite and U.S. Army’s SECOR II geodetic satellite. SECOR
II “failed to deploy properly from its piggyback container.” SECOR II was
a 18-kg geodetic satellite.
On 31 March 1965,
U.S. Army disclosed it had orbited a three-satellite earth-mapping system,
with two of the spacecraft circling the earth from west to east and the
third traveling from pole to pole. The satellites were of the Secor type.
Two were fired into orbit earlier this month; the other was launched Jan.
11, 1964. The three spacecraft, each with a radio receiver and transmitter,
were helping pinpoint locations on earth that were widely separated by
large bodies of water.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 118, 158, 580 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 60
Spacecraft: |
E-6 No. 9 SA |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #37 ; 1965-018A ; 516th spacecraft,
1,246th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
|
.
KH-7 16 / Gambit-1 16
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 16 / GAMBIT SV 966 /
OPS 4920 ; AFP-206 SV 966 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #38 ; 1965-019A ; 517th spacecraft,
1,247th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 61
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #39 ; 1965-020A ; 518th spacecraft,
2,267th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
15 March 1965 at 11h02 UTC, from
Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-41, by a Kosmos C-1 (65S3). |
Orbit: |
273 km x 1,837 km x 56° x
106 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
15 January 1968. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
into orbit three earth satellites - Cosmos LXI, Cosmos LXII, and Cosmos
LxIII - with a single booster rocket. TASS said these satellites were orbiting
in close initial orbits. It was reported that the scientific apparatus
onboard was functioning normally. Officially: continuation of Cosmos scientific
satellite series. Accompanying vehicle disintegrated into more than 120
fragments.
On 19 May 1965, NASA’s Goddard Satellite
Situation Report showed that Cosmos LXI, Cosmos LXII, and Cosmos LXIII
had become 26 satellites or pieces of satellites.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 123, 238, 580 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 62
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #40 ; 1965-020B ; 519th spacecraft,
1,268th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
15 March 1965 at 11h02 UTC, from
Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-41, by a Kosmos C-1 (65S3). |
Orbit: |
273 km x 1,837 km x 56° x
106 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
24 September 1968. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
into orbit three earth satellites - Cosmos LXI, Cosmos LXII, and Cosmos
LxIII - with a single booster rocket. TASS said these satellites were orbiting
in close initial orbits. It was reported that the scientific apparatus
onboard was functioning normally. Officially: continuation of Cosmos
scientific satellite series.
On 19 May 1965,
NASA’s Goddard Satellite Situation Report showed that Cosmos LXI, Cosmos
LXII, and Cosmos LXIII had become 26 satellites or pieces of satellites.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 123, 238, 580 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
89 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 63
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #41 ; 1965-020C ; 520th spacecraft,
1,269th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
15 March 1965 at 11h02 UTC, from
Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-41, by a Kosmos C-1 (65S3). |
Orbit: |
273 km x 1,837 km x 56° x
106 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
4 Novembe 1967. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
into orbit three earth satellites - Cosmos LXI, Cosmos LXII, and Cosmos
LxIII - with a single booster rocket. TASS said these satellites were orbiting
in close initial orbits. It was reported that the scientific apparatus
onboard was functioning normally. Officially: continuation of Cosmos
scientific satellite series.
On 19 May 1965,
NASA’s Goddard Satellite Situation Report showed that Cosmos LXI, Cosmos
LXII, and Cosmos LXIII had become 26 satellites or pieces of satellites.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 123, 238, 580 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
90 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
P-35-11 / DAPP 11
Spacecraft: |
OPS 7353 / DMSP Block 4A F2
Data Acquisition and Processing Program
Defense Meteorological, Satellite Program |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #42 ; 1965-021A ; 521st spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Voskhod 2
Spacecraft: |
Voskhod 3KD No. 4 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #43 ; 1965-022A ; 522nd spacecraft,
1,274th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Piloted spaceship |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
Launch: |
18 March 1965 at 7h00 UTC, from
Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-1, by an A-2/"Voskhod" (11A57). |
Orbit: |
173 km x 495 km x 65° x 91
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R.’s Voskhod
II, manned by pilot Col. Pave1 Belyayev and co-pilot Lt. Col. Aleksey Leonov,
was launched from Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan, TASS reported. The
spacecraft set an altitude record, reaching an apogee of 495 km -higher
than any manned spacecraft had flown.
During the second orbit. Lt. Col. Leonov,
clad in a spacesuit with “autonomous life support system.” stepped into
space, moved about five meters from the spacecraft (tethered by a cable),
and successfully carried out prescribed studies and observations: he examined
the outer surface of the spacecraft; turned on a film camera; carried out
visual observations of the Earth and outer space: took horizontal, vertical,
and somersaulting positions; and returned safely to the spacecraft. TASS
said: “Outside the ship and after returning, Leonov feels well.” He spent
about 20 min. in conditions of outer space, including 10 min. free-floating
in space. Entire procedure was carried out under control of Col. Belyayev,
with whom continuous communication was maintained. A television camera
fixed to the side of Voskhod II relayed pictures of the maneuver to Soviet
ground stations.
Biotelemetric data indicated that both cosmonauts
had satisfactorily withstood the orbiting and the transition to weightlessness:
the pulse rate of Belyayev and Leonov was 70-72 beats a minute and the
respiration rate 18-20 a minute. All spacecraft systems were functioning
normall). TASS said Voskhod II would complete at least 13 orbits of the
Earth.
After 26 hours.
of flight, Col. Pavel Belyayev landed Voskhod II manually near Perm, Russia,
TASS announced. The two-man spacecraft had completed 17 orbits of the Earth,
one more orbit than planned, and had traveled 720,000 km. This was the
first time landing of a Soviet spacecraft had been described as manual.
Impact of Voskhod II on the ground, later revealed as snow bank, was described
as “soft.”
In an interview
with Izvestia, one of the two directors of the Soviet space program,
the “chief designer,” whose identity had never been revealed [that is:
Sergei Korolev], said the Voskhod II program had called for Lt. Col. Leonov
to spend “10 minutes outside the cabin” but that he could have stayed much
longer. He said the weight and space saved by having two men aboard Voskhod
II instead of three men. as on Voskhod I, had been used to install a decompression
chamber and related equipment. The designer said Leonov’s spacesuit was
equipped with “duplicate systems” to ensure a high degree of reliability
and that a bellows had been installed to allow bending of the torso, arms,
and legs. The “chief theoretician,” [?] said that Leonov’s principal
assignment had been to determine man’s reaction to “weightlessness in free
space.” He told TASS: “We obtained in practice what we had visualized theoretically
before.”
On 20 March 1965,
Voskhod II’s two-man crew rested under medical supervision at an undisclosed
place in the northern Ural mountains, TASS reported. Soviet space flight
headquarters at Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan reported that Voskhod
II’s antennas had burned away as the spacecraft reentered the earth’s atmosphere.
The descent had been tracked by radar units. Lt. Col. Andrian G. Nikolayev,
Soviet Cosmonaut, said the order to use manual controls in landing Voskhod
II was given by a Soviet ground station, Izvestia reported. It was
not known whether the manual landing was part of the original program or
was made necessary by a malfunction of the automatic controls.
Soviet Cosmonaut
Andrian Nikolayev said in the press that "all these operations -- the orientation
of Voskhod 2 and switching on of the braking engine -- were performed by
my colleague cosmonauts by hand, without the help of automation. They performed
this task brilliantly. They carried out this landing excellently." He did
not say if they had landed in their target landing area.
Soviet Cosmonauts
Col. Pavel I. Belyayev and Lt. Col. Aleksey Leonov appeared in public on
21 March for the first time since they landed Voskhod II in the Perm region
Mar. 19. They were en route to Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan where
they were expected to undergo detailed medical checkups and debriefings
by scientists and technicians before being welcomed in Moscow in Red Square.
At a news conference reported by Soviet press, Col. Pavel Belyayev and
Lt. Col. Aleksey Leonov said they had sighted an artificial satellite during
their flight: “We shouted with surprise when we saw it slowly rotating
about 800 meters from our ship.” Neither the satellite nor the orbit in
which it was traveling was identified.
Col. Leonov said
that when he opened the hatch of the air lock after decompression, he was
“struck by a flow of blindingly bright sunlight like an arc of electric
welding.” The spacecraft was in its second orbit, passing over Kerch Strait.
Space had an unexpected aspect, he said: “Ahead of me was black sky, very
black. The sun was not radiant, just a smooth disc without an aureole.
Below was the smooth-level earth. You could not tell it was a sphere, only
by the fact that the round edge showed on the horizon.” The acrobatics
tired Leonov, especially because of the effort required to move. He said
that although the program required that he carefully wind the rope that
had tethered him to the craft, he found it “a waste of time” and simply
pulled it into the hatch. “The commander quickly closed the hatch cover
and injected pressure into the air lock,”
Describing the manually
controlled landing, Col. Belyayev said the controls were switched on in
time and all systems had “worked without a hitch.” He said the spacecraft
landed in the northern Ural mountains between two big spruce trees in snow
1.5-3 metres deep.
In an editorial
in Aviation Week and Space Technology, editor Robert Hotz said:
“The trail-blazing mission of the Soviet Voskhod 2 still is continuing
as these lines are written, but it has already opened a new chapter in
the history of man’s conquest of space. It also has emphasized again that,
unless some drastic changes are made, this history will be written primarily
in the Russian Cyrillic alphabet with only an occasional U.S. footnote
technically necessary…
“All of this Soviet
progress again emphasizes strongly the ultra-conservatism of the U.S. manned
space flight program and the utter inadequacy of the tiny step-by-step
approach that sounds so convincing when defending under-funded programs.
This approach is sounding more and more idiotic in the face of Soviet space
achievements…
“Each Soviet manned
space flight makes it clearer that the Russians are widening their lead
over the U.S. in this vital area. It also makes it clear that the many
billions the American people have poured willingly into our national space
program for the purpose of wresting this leadership from the Soviets are
not going to achieve that goal under the present management…”
On 23 March 1965,
an editorial in Red Star, the Soviet Defense Ministry newspaper,
revealed that the booster that had launched Voskhod II had developed 650
tons of thrust. The article said Soviet rockets were “unmatched” and that
the Voskhod II flight “expedites the appearance of orbital stations and
the landing of people in the heavenly bodies.”
NASA Administrator
James E. Webb regarded a Russian cosmonaut’s leaving a space vehicle briefly
as spectacular but said the U.S. was more intent on developing a space
suit that would enable American astronauts to work outside on space vehicles
and develop or put together space centers.
On 25 March 1965,
it was reported that the use of a special airlock through which Lt. Col.
Aleksei Leonov passed from the spacecraft cabin into space and back again
was a major factor in the success of the Voskhod II flight Mar. 18, it
was reported. According to Soviet sources, the preservation of normal pressure
inside the spacecraft throughout flight had had an important psychological
effect on both Col. Relyayev and Col. Leonov.
On 25 March 1965,
Pavel Belyayev told a Moscow news conference that Voskhod II had been scheduled
to land after 16 orbits, but that there was an inaccuracy in “the solar
system of orientation” that prevented use of the automatic landing system.
He said he then had to obtain radioed permission from the Soviet space
center to land by manual control after the 17th orbit. The landing site
was overshot “by a certain distance” Belyayev said without disclosing how
much.
Leonov described
time outside the ship saying “it is too early to call it a pleasant walk.
It could not have been done without hard training.” He reported his small
push on Voskhod II to move away from it after going out of the hatch started
the spacecraft into slow rotation. In pulling himself back to the Voskhod
II by his cable, Leonov disclosed he had yanked rather vigorously and had
to put his hand out to avoid collision with the spacecraft.
Belyayev said he
and Leonov were found by a helicopter 2% hrs. after a soft landing in snowy
woods near Perm. He said Voskhod II was airlifted back to the launch site
at Baikonur in Soviet Central Asia and could be used again if necessary.
On 27 March 1965,
M. V. Keldysh. President of the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, commented
on the Voskhod II flight in an article in Izvestin: “One of the most significant
accomplishments in the conquest of space was the experiment dealing with
man’s emergence into space. New, grandiose perspectives are now open for
the construction of orbital stations, the docking of spacecraft in orbit
and the carrying out of astronomical and geophysical investigations in
space. In the near future, it will be possible to create, in orbit around
the earth, a Space Scientific Research Institute in which scientists representing
the most diversified fields will be able to work. The results obtained
as a result of the flight of ‘Voskhod-2’ are most important steps on the
way toward carrying out flights to the moon and on to other celestial bodies.”
On 29 March 1965,
Pravda gives the first detailed description of the inside of the Voskhod
II spacecraft. The airlock was apparently built into the place occupied
by a third astronaut during the Voskhod I flight. After Col. Leonov moved
into the airlock, his companion, Col. Belyayev, pressed a button that closed
the inside door and created a vacuum inside the lock chamber. At the prescribed
moment, Col. Belyayev pressed a second button that opened the hatch between
the airlock and space, allowing Col. Leonov to climb out. The procedure
was apparently reversed for the astronaut’s return.
Russian physicist
Gennadii Skuridin made public for the first time: on 4-6 may 196t that
pressure in Aleksey Leonov’s spacesuit during his walk was about 0.4 atmosphere]
and that Leonov had trouble with his vision and in orienting himself while
in space, but was capable of performing useful work. A thirty-minute movie
of Leonov’s walk in space gave closeup views of construction of Voskhod
II’s airlock, Leonov’s spacesuit, gloves, footwear, and life-support equipment
back pack.
Some of Aleksey
Leonov’s comments on its EVA were made public on 24 May 1965: “I found
that the slightest shift in direction of the force of impact caused rotation
in the corresponding plane. Those persons who will be working in space
will obviously have much to do in securing their bodies in … [the weightless
state]. As for the so-called psychological barrier that was supposed to
be insurmountable by man preparing to confront the cosmic abyss alone,
I not only did not sense any barrier, but even forgot that there could
be one.”
On 12 July 1965,
Pavel BeIyayev disciosed in an ariicle in the newspaper Sovietsky Patriot
that the heat was so intense when he was forced to land Voskhod II by manual
controls that drops of molten metal ran down the portholes. He said when
he discovered that something was wrong with the automatic landing system
of the two-man spacecraft, he asked ground control for permission to use
the manual system-something that had never been done before during a Soviet
manned spaceflight.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 131-2, 134-5, 135, 136, 138, 139-40, 140,
140-1, 147, 152, 153, 154-5, 156, 157, 216, 278-9, 320, 580-1 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
90 ;
Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Leonov : the first human-tethered
"spacecraft"
|
On 18 March 1965, cosmonaut Aleksei Leonov
became a "human satellite" when he exited from his Voskhod spacecraft,
making the first "spacewalk". But contrary to future spacewalkers, he was
not entirely autonomous from his spacecraft; his spacesuit nearly qualifies
as a semi-autonomus spacecraft. |
|
.
Ranger 9
Spacecraft: |
RA-9 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #44 ; 1965-023A ; 523rd spacecraft,
2,294th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
21 March 1965 at 21h37 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-12, by an Atlas-Agena B (Atlas LV-3A 204D / Agena B
6007). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Crashed on the Moon: |
24 March 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Ranger IX, equipped
with six television cameras, was successfully launched toward the Moon.T
he 360 kg spacecraft continued on its 2½-day, 395 000 km trip to
the Moon. Projected target was the crater Alphonsus, about 12°
south of the Moon's equator, where gaseous emissions had been reported.
Five hours after lift-off, NASA announced that Ranger IX’s course was so
accurate it would hit the Moon only 650 km north of the crater target;
an inflight maneuver would be executed later to correct this small course
error.
After transmitting
5,811 close-up lunar pictures to earth, Ranger IX travelling at 9,617 km/h,
impacted the Moon on 24 March 1965 at 9:08 a.m. EST at 12.9° south
latitude ant 2.4° west longitude in the crater Alphonsus. The
spacecraft was only six kilometres off target.
NASA had made real-time
TV coverage available and the three major networks broadcast “live” pictures
during the last ten minutes of Ranger IX flight. First pictures taken
as the photographic probe was 2,000 km from the Moon. had about the same
degree of detail as telescope views from Earth. Those takan a few
seconds before impact defined objects as small as 25 cm across, including
close-ups of canal-like rilles on the floor of the crater and dimple-like
depressions at points along the rilles. Photographs shown on television
were taken by the “B” camera, one of two wide-angle cameras used. Four
narrow-angle cameras took other shots.
Ranger IX was last
in the Ranger series, and otal number of photographs from Ranger VII, VIII,
and IX was 17,267.
A panel of scientists
analyzed slides of the Ranger IX lunar pictures at a post-impact press
conference and noted that crater rims -- some with level areas -- and ridges
inside the walls seemed harder than the plains
but that floors of the craters appeared to
be solidified volcanic froth that would not support a landing vehicle.
Volcanic activity was inferred from indications that the moon had at least
three types of craters not caused by meteorite impact.
Dr. Ewan A. Whitaker of the Lunar and Planetary
Laboratory of the Univ. of Arizona, said parts of the highlands around
the crater Alphonsus and ridges within it seemed harder and smoother than
the dusty lunar plains. Dr. Gerard P. Kuiper, of the same laboratory, said
of the crater: “It might well be better to make landings there.”
Most significant
finding of Ranger IX’s photographs, according to Dr. Eugene Shoemaker of
the U.S. Geological Survey, was the smoothness of the crater walls and
of the long ridges on the floor of the crater.
Dr. Harold Urey of the Univ. of California
referred to black patches in the pictures which he said might be composed
of graphite: “… these dark halo craters are due to some sort of plutonic
activity beneath the surface of the moon. They do not look to me like terrestrial
volcanoes… They look like a unique lunar type of object.” Dr. Urey said
a Soviet scientist had reported a red flare near a peak in Alphonsus and
that analysis had indicated presence of a molecule with two carbon atoms.
He said this was “a very curious situation because this molecule … does
not escape from any known volcano” on earth.
President Johnson
issued a congratulatory statement that said: “… Coming so close after yesterday’s
Gemini success, this far-out photography reveals the balance of the United
States space program. Steps toward the manned flight to the moon have become
rapid and coordinated strides, as manned space maneuvers of one day are
followed by detailed pictures of the moon on the next.”
On 8 Aprl 1965,
Dr. Eugene Shoemaker. head of the astrogeological branch of the U.S. Geological
Survey, said that the Ranger program had cost a total of about $200 million.
He estimated that each Ranger shot had cost just under $30 million and
said that, although four of the seven Ranger missions had failed, it would
have been foolish to settle for one success: “Just imagine that the Martians
sent a Ranger-like camera to take pictures of the Earth. With just one
shot, they’d end up with pictures of a space no bigger than the size of
an urban lot, or of the peak of the Alps, or of the sand dunes in Arabia.
Could they tell anything about the Earth from pictures of just one of these?”
The Ranger program gave U.S. scientists good pictures of three different
areas of the Moon. Shoemaker said. ’A Ranger picture is worth a million
computer words.”
On 15-16 April 1965,
world scientists met in a special conference on the lunar surface sponsored
by the International Astronomical Union and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
at Greenbelt, Md.
Noting areas of
disagreement among scientists, theoretical astrophysicist Thomas Gold of
Cornell Univ. tried to explain why the Ranger pictures resolved so little:
“The Ranger pictures are like a mirror. Everyone sees his own theories
reflected in them.” Prof. Gold saw a moon covered with dust; young craters
composed of solid rock while older craters had somehow gone soft; and vast
sheets of ice locked under compacted sediment beneath much of the lunar
surface.
Dr. Harold C. Urey,
Nobel prize-winning chemist from the Univ. of California, referred to evidence
of widespread collapse of the lunar surface, probably due to underground
movement: “The Ranger IX’s pictures scared me more than anything. There’s
all sorts of evidence that some of these craters are sinking.”
Dr. Eugene Shoemaker
of the Geological Survey said that chances that the moon’s surface was
too soft for the 15-ton LEM were “almost vanishingly remote.” (Simons,
Wash. Post, 4/16/65; Clark, NYT, 4/16/65)
Dr. Ewan A. Whitaker
agreed with findings in the paper he presented for his colleague, Dr. Gerald
P. Kuiper of the Univ. of Arizona’s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory. Dr.
Kuiper concluded that the lunar surface had a bearing strength of between
one and two tons per square foot. His calculations, made from data extracted
from Ranger IX photographs. was based on the size of rocks ejected from
a given impact crater and the distance they traveled. Other tentative findings
were that the dark portions of the maria were due to some unknown fluid
flows and not lava or ash flows; that the maria were not completely covered
with lunar dust; and that the moon’s surface exhibited a remarkable series
of fracture patterns which could be due to polar contraction, tidal effects,
or some other force.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's
Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 140, 142, 146, 148-9, 149, 150, 175, 187-8,
581 ;
National Space Science Data
Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p. 90 ; Gunter's
; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Gemini 3 / Gemini III
(“Molly Brown”)
Spacecraft: |
Gemini SC3 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #45 ; 1965-024A ; 524th spacecraft,
1,301st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Piloted spaceship |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
23 March 1965 at 14h24 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-19, by a Titan 2 (GT-3). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Recovered: |
23 March 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Gemini III spacecraft
(“Molly Brown”), with Virgil I. Grissom (Maj. USAF) as command pilot, and
John W. Young (LCdr. USN) as pilot, was successfully launched.
Withing six minutes
after lift-off, Gemini III was injected into elliptical orbit with apogee:
224 km; perigee: 161 km; period: 88 minutes. Speed of spacecraft
was 26,700 km/h. Toward the end of the first orbit, 93 minutes after launching,
the first maneuver was performed: Grissom fired two small thruster rockets
that pushed “backward” on the spacecraft, slowing it down by about72 km/h.
Lessened velocity caused Gemini III to drop in altitude to a near-circular
orbit with apogee: 169 km; perigee: 158 km.
Second maneuver
occurred during second orbit; Grissom used the thrusters to turn the spacecraft
broadside to its flight path. Then, he gave a burst that pushed the craft
about 1/50th of a degree from the orbital course. Short bursts, fired rapidly
allowed the craft to be turned it into a course nearly parallel to his
original one. Third maneuver came in the third orbit; Grissom fired
the spacecraft thruster rockets dropping into an orbit with perigee of
82 km.
Manually controlling
reentry, the astronauts turned the spacecraft’s blunt end forward, ejected
the section carrying the retrorockets. Four hours and 53 minutes after
launching, Gemini III safely landed in the Atlantic Ocean off Grand Turk
Island, considerably off target and some 80-95 km away from the recovery
ship, Intrepid.
Navy frogmen from
hovering aircraft fastened a float around Gemini III. Original plans had
called for the spacecraft, with the astronauts still inside, to be hoisted
aboard the recovery ship and immediate medical checks made. But when Grissom
became seasick, the men were picked up by helicopter and landed on the
Intrepid;
the spacecraft was recovered later.
The astronauts helped
perform two experiments. One was the irradiation of human blood to test
the combined effects on it of weightlessness and irradiation. The other
was to squirt small jets of water into the plasma sheath that surrounded
the spacecraft as it reentered the Earth's atmosphere, testing a theory
that a fluid flowing through the ionized layer of atoms would permit radio
signals to penetrate the communications blackout common to reentry.
Gemini officials
said that, so far as was known, this was the first time a manned spacecraft
had maneuvered in orbit, changing its orbital path.
Dr. George E. Mueller,
NASA Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight, said at a press conference:
“This particular flight is noteworthy for many reasons. Perhaps most importantly
it is the first manned flight of a Gemini vehicle and it represents, then,
the first step in the remaining twelve Gemini flights. In this flight …
we did for the first time carry out an orbital maneuver in space. Another
first was the first demonstration of reentry control. We did control reentry
landing point on this mission. Another first was the use of Syncom for
communications with the Coastal Sentry Quebec during the course
of the flight.”
An editorial in
the March 24, 1965 Baltimore Sun said: “Yesterday’s Gemini flight
is described as ‘historic’ and so it was. So too is each successful new
space exploration, launched by whatever country, manned or unmanned… What
is happening is that a body of knowledge is being accumulated through increasingly
accurate photographs and increasingly sophisticated exercises and experiences
on the part of the adventurers of our age, the astronauts…”
NASA Administrator
James E. Webb made these points: “The most significant accomplishment of
the GT-3 flight was that … it provided verification of the basic design,
development, test and operations procedures NASA is using to develop manned
spacecraft, man-rated launch vehicles and a world-wide operational network…
On 25 March, at
a press conference, Virgil Grissom and John Young described the three-orbit
GT-3 flight as busy, exhilarating, near-perfect, and short on surprises.
They said it was highly significant for future flight in space since it
proved that a spacecraft could be maneuvered precisely, at will, and more
independently of the ground than before. They said it also proved that
man can eat and safely dispose of wastes as they will need to do on long
flights. Major Grissom suggested two possible reasons that the “Molly Brown”
had undershot the target landing area: one was that something might have
gone wrong during the final orbit change or when subsequently the braking
rockets were fired to start the spacecraft’s descent; the other was that
there might have been a miscalculation of the craft’s center of gravity.
On 6 April 1965, Subcommittee Chairman Albert Thomas (D-Teu.) and the House
Independent Offices Appropriations Subcommittee were highly critical of
Astronaut Virgil Grissom’s deviation from flight plan instructions during
the Gemini III flight and eating a sandwich instead of fasting. According
to published reports, one Subcommittee member referred to a “$30 million
corned beef sandwich.” and another asked NASA Administrator James E. Webb
how he could control a multi-million dollar budget if he could not control
two astronauts.
On 21 April 1965,
NASA absolved Astronaut Virgil I. Grissom of any blame in the 93-m off-target
landing of the Gemini III spacecraft, according to MSC spokesman. The mishap
was attributed to the fact that the spacecraft did not develop as much
lift as expected.
On 3 May 1965, Charles
W. Mathews, Gemini program manager explained why Gemini III landed about
100 km short of predicted spot: The pilots were instructed to fly a bank
angle based on wind-tunnel data of Gemini spacecraft’s lift characteristics.
But in actual reentry, the spacecraft’s “lift was only about 2/3 of what
we had expected it to be.” Onboard instrumentation showed the discrepancy,
but the command pilot followed ground instructions. When he ultimately
changed the angle, based on the onboard display, it was too late to achieve
the spacecraft target.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 13 April 1964, NASA announced Gus Grissom
and John Young would be prime pilots for the first manned Gemini space
flight (GT-3), with Walter Schirra and Tom Stafford as backup pilots.
On 14 September
1964, NASA announced the next U.S. manned space flight, Project Gemini
GT-3, had been delayed into 1965 because of time lost as result of lightning
damage to GT-2 launch vehicle and removal of the rocket from launch pad
during hurricanes Cleo and Dora. Dr. George E. Mueller, NASA Associate
Administrator for Manned Space Flight, said GT-2 unmanned suborbital mission
would be made in last quarter of 1964. GT-3, with Astronauts Virgil I.
Grissom and John Young as crew members, was scheduled for first quarter
of 1965.
On 17 March 1965,
astronauts Virgil I. Grissom and John W. Young gave the official name “Gemini
3” and the nickname “Molly Brown” to the spacecraft they would ride into
orbit Mar. 23.
More than 900 representatives
of news media had been accredited, making the GT-3 mission of Astronauts
Virgil I. Grissom and John W. Young the most intensely covered event in
the history of space exploration. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics, 1964, p. 134, 316 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 130, 142, 145-6, 147, 150, 152, 153, 172,
193, 214-5, 581 ;
National Space
Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p. 90 ;
Gunter's
; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 64 / Zenit-2
#26
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-2 11F61 No. 17 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #46 ; 1965-025A ; 525th spacecraft,
1,305th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Discoverer 89 / KH-4A
18 / CORONA 93
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1018 / CORONA J-19 / OPS
4803 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #47 ; 1965-026A ; 526th spacecraft,
1,307th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
Launch: |
25 March 1965 at 21h11 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's LC-75-3-4, by a Thor-Agena D (Thor 2C 429 /
Agena D SS-01B 1612). |
Orbit: |
180 km x 237 km x 96.02°
x 88.9min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Recovered: |
4 April 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: USAF launched
an unidentified satellite from Vandenberg AFB on a Thor- Agena D booster.
Officially, this ‘DOD Spacecraft’ develop spaceflight techniques and technology.
Reentry on 5 April 1965.
On 5 April 1965,
Danish satellite tracking station official reported what he believed to
have been the explosion of a U.S. satellite launched by USAF Mar. 25. About
ten brilliantly lighted objects crossing the sky were at first assumed
to have been meteors.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 152, 170, 582 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; NRO's
Corona : JPL's
Corona : TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p. 90 ; Gunter's
; Celestrak's Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
SNAP 10A / SNAPShot
Spacecraft: |
OPS 4682 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #48 ; 1965-027A ; 527th spacecraft,
1,304th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force & U.S. Army |
|
|
Launch: |
3 April 1965 at 21h24 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's PALC-2-4, by an Atlas-Agena D (Atlas 7401 /
Agena D). |
Orbit: |
1,268 km x 1,320 km x 90.17°
x 111.5 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: Atomic Energy
Commission’s 440 kg Snapshot spacecraft carrying SNAP-10A nuclear reactor
was successfully launched. Four burns after injection into orbit, radio
command from Earth activated by 113 kg nuclear reactor by moving internal
shielding that had kept the emission of electron from the uranium 235 fuel
element from tracking the chain reaction stage. The reactor would provide
electric-power for a 1-kg ion engine. This was the first attempt to test
a reactor–ion system in orbit.
Twelve hours after
launch, radio signals from the Agena vehicle carrying the reactor indicated
it was producing 620-668 watts of electricity - some 20% over its designed
power. Electricity generated by the reactor would be stored in a
218-kg bank of batteries and released as the ion engine was put through
start-stop tests during a three-month period. The engine would manufacture
its own power by electrically vaporizing the 100 grams of the metal cesium
in its fuel tank into atomic particles and expelling them at high speed
through a nozzle to provide thrust of 10 miligrams.
AEC said the satellite
would stay aloft more than 3.000 years - far beyond the 100 years it would
take for the reactor’s radioactive elements to decay to a safe level. The
reactor would be shut down after a year, the ion engine after about three
months.
If successful, the
test would signal the first operation in space of a light, compact, propulsion
system that would produce power over long periods on small amounts of fuel
for (1) surveillance and patrol satellites functioning in orbit for years,
and (2) manned spaceships capable of speeds of 150,000 km/h on trips to
distant planets now beyond the reach of conventionallyfuelled rockets.
On 7 April 1965,
USAF announced that data from SNAP-10A satellite indicated “an extremely
high noise factor” when the ion engine was turned on, making it impossible
to determine whether it was operating properly. Scientists said the engine,
which on Apr. 2 had operated normally for an hour, would not be tested
further until additional analyses were made. The difficulty had not interfered
with the major experimentoperation of the SNAP-10A nuclear reactor.
Mission objective:
Test operation and life of a remotely-controlled nuclear reactor in space;
also test ion propulsion. Twelve hours after launch, SNAP 10A was producing
600 watts of power. Operated until 20 may 1965, when reactor shut
down automatically for reasons external to its own operation. Ion propulsion
unit did not perform adequately.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 14 November 1962, “Lt. Col. Charles N.
Barnes (USAF) of AEC Reactor Development Div. told that first attempt to
orbit nuclear reactor in joint AEC-USAF Project Snapshot would be made
next year. Snap-10A would be launched with Atlas-Agena vehicle, the Agena
stage to be orbited with the 430 kg Snap-10A which would furnish auxiliary
electric power for instruments. Intended orbit would be several hundred
mi. high. Reactor would be turned off after a year and the accumulated
radioactive fission products allowed to decay over period of several hundred
years; it would be designed to disintegrate during re-entry into earth’s
atmosphere.“
On 5 October 1964,
USAF announced an ion rocket would be tested in 90-day orbital flight next
spring, using Agena vehicle. Electrical power to operate the engine would
be provided by SNAP 10A reactor, the first test combining an electrical
propulsion engine and a nuclear reactor in space. Spokesmen said
similar rocket had been succest+fdly tested in August in suborbital flight
from Pt. Arguello, Calif. The new engine, developed by Electro-Optical
Systeme, was said to have “developed the unheard-of specific impulse level
of 7,800 seconds -- roughly 20 times greater than the best chemical rockets
of today.” |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; National Space Science
Data Center's ; Astronautical
And Aeronautical Events of 1962, p. 241 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics, 1964, p. 340-1 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 166-67, 172, 242, 582 ; TRW Space Log
1996 (Vol. 32), p. 90 ; Gunter's
; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Secor 4 / EGRS 4
Spacecraft: |
SEquential COllation of Range |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #49 ; 1965-027B ; 528th spacecraft,
1,315th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Geodesy |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force & U.S. Army |
|
|
|
.
Intelsat 1 / Early Bird
(Intelsat 1A)
Spacecraft: |
Intelsat 1 F-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #50 ; 1965-028A ; 529th spacecraft,
1,317th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications |
Sponsor: |
Intelsat / International Telecommunications
Satellit Consortium |
|
|
Launch: |
6 April 1965 at 23h47 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-17A, by a Delta DSV-3D (Thor Delta D 426 / Delta 30). |
Orbit: |
Initial: 1,463 km x 36,510 km
x 11 hrs. 10 min.
9 Apr 65: 35,041.9 km x 36,637.1 km.
14 Apr 65: 35,780 km x 35,811 km x 0.085°
x 23 hrs. 56 min. 57 sec.
Geostationary at 28.0” West longitude. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Forever in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: ComSatCorp’s 38.5
kg Early Bird I, the first commercial communications satellite, was successfully
launched. An hour after launching, flight control center confirmed that
the satellite had entered an elliptical transfer orbit and was sending
clear radio signals. NASA handled the launching under a contract with ComSatCorp.
Early Bird I would become the first link in ComSatCorp’s proposed worldwide
satellite communications system and would relay radio, television, teletype,
and telephone messages between North America and Europe.
On 7 April 1965,
Early Bird I successfully received, amplified, and returned a television
signal to Andover, Me., ground station in an unscheduled communications
test. ComSatCorp Vice President Siegfried H. Reiger said that “the picture
quality of the test pattern was excellent.”
On 9 April 1965,
Early Bird I was placed into a “near letter perfect” synchronous orbit.
The five-day-early maneuver was accomplished by firing small retrorocket
for 19.7 seconds. The satellite would be allowed to drift about 5°
(over500 km) to the exact point over the Atlantic where it would remain
for its expected three to five year lifetime. Early Bird I reached its
permanent station over the Atlantic Ocean on 14 April 1965.
On 23 April 1965,
Successful simultaneous two-way transmission of television tests via Early
Bird communications satellite between the U.S. ground station at Andover,
Me., and European ground stations at Pleumeur-Bodou, France; Goonhilly
Downs, England; and Raisting, W. Germany, was announced by ComSatCorp.
The pictures were of good quality.
On 28 May 1965,
a tariff for the use of Early Bird satellites for transmission and reception
of voice, record, data, telephoto, facsimile, television, and other signals
was filed by ComSatCorp with the FCC. Beginning Sunday, June 27, voice
channels would be available between 5 a.m. and 9 p.m. EDT on a daily basis.
Minimum rental period, one month; rent, $4,200. Voice channels would be
two-way. No refunds would be given for interruptions of less than 30 min.
or for those caused by solar eclipse. Interruptions of 30 min. or more
not the responsibility of the customer would be refunded at roughly $3
per 30-min. interruption. ComSatCorp could request temporary surrender
of a voice channel for TV use. […]
On 3 May 1965, Early
Bird I transmitted clear pictures and sound of live television programs
between Europe and North America for 14 hrs., demonstrating its usefulness
in regularly scheduled television. For three weeks, television’s use of
Early Bird I would be restricted to Mondays; daily commercial use would
not begin until fall when rates had been fixed. The satellite would be
used on other days for telephone purposes and transmission of recorded
information.
On 6 April 1971,
Intelsat 1 was reactivated to mark its sixth anniversary and relay first
message ever transmitted directly from Hawaii to US. East Coast via commercial
satellite.
* * * * *
Early Bird 1 was a 35.5-kg
satellite for commercial communications experiments. The 72.4 cm x 59.0
cm cylindrical spacecraft carried 2 traveling-wave tube transmitters, 2
VHF transmitters and 6 antennas. Its launched on a preliminary orbit was
so excellent that, five days before schedule, ComSatCorp. was able to fire
Early Bird’s apogee motor to place the satellite into synchronous orbit.
Within a week of launch, Early Bird 1 began communications relay between
Europe and North America, and offered continuous voice, TV, and data transmission
over its 240 duplex channels.
On 9 June 1965,
Early Bird I demonstrated its ability to relay commercial voice messages,
photographs, and data between Europe and the U.S. During one exchange,
a news photograph was relayed from London to the N.Y. offices of the Associated
Press; simultaneously, Pan American Airways was relaying international
airline reservations and communications, including pilot and control messages.
Other uses included transmission of pictures and layouts for a fashion
magazine and relay of bank signatures from New York for verification of
a check-signer in London. Except for a slight echo bounced back from Europe
on the voice transmissions, the reception was excellent.
On 15 June 1965,
high-speed transmission of weather data between the U.S. and France was
provided by Early Bird I communications satellite. Information gathered
by TIROS IX weather satellite during a 24-hr. period and assembled on a
chart at the World Weather Center in Maryland, was relayed to the Andover,
Me., ground station; then, via Early Bird I, it was transmitted to the
French ground station at Pleumeur-Bodou and on to the French National Weather
Center in Paris. The demonstration illustrated a new and advanced forecast
method which would include transmissions of facsimile charts and data at
eight times the speed of present networks.
* * * * *
Current overview: Built by Hughes Aircraft,
Early Bird was a first step toward global telecommunications and was a
commercial version of Hughes’ Syncom satellite. |
Notes: |
On 4 March 1964, ComSatCorp applied to FCC
for authority to construct and orbit over the mid-Atlantic a synchronous-orbit
communications satellite to provide commercial service on an “experimental-operational”
basis between North America and Europe. The satellite was described by
ComSatCorp as an “initial step in the development of a global communications
system.” It would provide 24-hour communications service capable of relaying
TV broadcasts or up to 240 telephone calls. Plans called for the satellite
to be orbited in spring of 1965 with a TAT-Delta booster supplied by NASA
on a reimbursable basis.
On 16 March 1964,
FCC announced Communications Satellite Corp. planned negotiation of $8
million contract with Hughes Aircraft Co. for development, fabrication,
assembly, test, maintenance, and service for “Early Bird” communications
satellite -- the proposed experimental-operational comsat system. The proposed
contract would be subject to FCC approval.
On 8 December 1964,
ComSatCorp told FCC it planned to launch its first satellite, the Early
Bird, in March as a communication link between Europe and North America.
The Early Bird would be able to transmit two-way telephone conversations,
television computer data, and other types of communications as an experiment
in synchronous satellites, placed above the equator at an altitude of 35,900
km.
On 23 December 1964,
NASA and ComSatCorp jointly announced the signing of an agreement covering
the launching by NASA of “Early Bird”-the first communications satellite
intended for commercial use. The agreement provided that NASA would launch
Early Bird into synchronous orbit above the Atlantic as soon after March
1st as NASA found feasible. ComSatCorp would pay NASA approximately $3.5
million for the initial launch, whether or not the Delta launch vehicle
was successful in orbiting the satellite, and for each subsequent launch
under the contract. The $3.5 million would reimburse NASA for the cost
of the Delta vehicle, other launch services, propellants, guidance and
tracking services, and data processing. Should the first launch be unsuccessful,
NASA would try again on a second satellite. The contract gave ComSatCorp
the option of calling for additional launches, after July 1, of synchronous
satellites of the same type. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Aeronautics
and Astronautics 1964, p. 96, 411, 431 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 172, 176, 180, 184, 197, 214, 256-7, 260,
273, 382, 582; National Space Science
Data Center's ; Astronautics
And Aeronautics, 1971, p. 98, 105 ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32),
p. 90 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Luna
Spacecraft: |
E-6 No. 8 SA |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #51 ; 1965 6th loss ; 530th
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 65 / Zenit-4
#6
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 6 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #52 ; 1965-029A ; 531st spacecraft,
1,320th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Molniya 1-1
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #53 ; 1965-030A ; 532nd spacecraft,
1,324th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union |
|
|
Launch: |
23 April 1965 at 1h55 UTC, from
Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-1, by an A-2-e/"Molniya" (8K78 U103-35). |
Orbit: |
Initial: 497 km x 39,380 km x
65° x 11 hr. 48 min.
April 1965: 498.4 km x 39,467.7 km x 11 hr.
48 min.
Early May 1965: 548.4 km x 40,045.2 km x
12 hr. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
27 May 1979. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
its first communications satellite Molniya I into orbit. Krasnaya Zvezda
reported that the “basic purpose of launching the Molniya-1 communications
satellite is to accomplish the transmission of TV programs and to perform
two-way multichannel telephone, phototelegraphic and telegraphic communication.
All the onboard equipment on the satellite and the ground radio network
are operating normally, and the first transmission of TV programs between
Vladivostok and Moscow were successfully completed.”
By early May 1965,
orbit of Molniya I was slightly corrected to increase its usefulness for
relaying telecasts between Moscow and Vladivostok. The corrected high elliptical
orbit put Molniya I within the visibility of Russia’s ground stations for
the greater part of its period.
On 6 May 1965, TASS
reports that Molniya I, because of its higher and sharply elongated orbit,
could transmit continuously several hours longer than American Telstars.
TASS claimed that Telstars could transmit uninterruptedly for only 30 minutes.
[Although not mentioning that the Early Bird satellite could transmit interreupltly
24/7 from its geostationary post.]
On 12 May 1965,
Molniya I maintained direct radiotelephone communications between Vladivostok
and Sofia, Warsaw, and Prague for almost three hours.
On 27 May 1965,
first experimental color television transmissions through the Soviet comsat
Molniya I were reported by TASS. Programs were transmitted continuously
for more than nine hours from the Moscow television center via Molniya
I to an unidentified ground station about 1,500 km from Moscow and by land
lines back to the Soviet capital. TASS said the tests included color television
systems developed in the U.S., France, and the Soviet Union. The U.S.S.R.
and France had recently concluded an agreement to cooperate in development
of a joint system.
On 30 May 1965,
Soviet press published first technical details and a sketch of Molniya
1. The satelllite, which was visible nine hours a day from Soviet
ground stations, had been used for experimental transmissions of television
programs, including color, between Moscoe and Vladivostok. According
to the drawing and the text description, Molniya I had an airtight cylindrical
body with conical ends, one of which contained a rocket engine used to
correct the orbit, as well as other solar orientation devices. Expanding
like spokes of a wheel from the cylinder were six long panels of solar
batteries to supply electrical power to the satellite for retransmission
of signals received from earth. It was equipped with two parabolic antennas,
one active, the other in reserve. These were pointed toward earth with
a high-precision direction finder for earth-bound transmissions. Molniya
I would make two 12-hr. revolutions around the earth every 24 hrs. One
loop would take it over the Soviet Union during daytime periods, when it
could be of most use for transmissions. The other loop would take it over
the United States.
On 4 July 1965,
status report on Molniya I was given by I. P. Petrushkin of the U.S.S.R.
Ministry of Communication: “Tests have demonstrated that the combinations
of the terrestrial and onboard communication equipment of the Molniya-1
satellite assure the possibility of the reliable transmission of black
and white TV.
“On Sundays, via
the Molniya-1, a regular exchange of TV programs is being conducted between
Moscow and the Pacific coast. During May and June, tests were also run
on the quality of the multichannel telephone system. The systems were simultaneously
loaded with phone conversations, tonal telegraphy, phototelegraphy. and
radio broadcasting programs. Even under such an ‘optimal’ regime, the communication
channels function fairly reliably.
“In June, there
was put into operation the commercial long-distance phone link between
Moscow and Vladivostok, functioning via the Molniya-1.” Color TV sessions
yielded encouraging results.
* * * * *
Current overview: The experimental communicitons
satellite Molniya 1 fonctioned well, established regular TV and telephone
relay periods between Moscow and Vladivostok; experimented with color TV.
Joint experiments were conducted with France on possible future international
comsat system. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 197, 216, 221, 228, 254, 259-60, 313,
583 ;
National Space Science Data
Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p. 90 ; Gunter's
; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
KH-7 17 / Gambit-1 17
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 17 / GAMBIT SV 967 /
OPS 4983 ; AFP-206 [F17] SV 967? |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #54 ; 1965-031A ; 533rd spacecraft,
1,327th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Hitchhiker 8
Spacecraft: |
OPS 6717 / [EHH B1] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #55 ; 1965-031B ; 534th spacecraft,
1,329th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Electronic intelligence |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Explorer 27 / Beacon
Explorer C
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #56 ; 1965-032A ; 535th spacecraft,
1,328th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Geodesy and upper atmosphere studies |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
29 April 1965 at 14h17 UTC, from
Wallops Island LA-3, by a Scout X-4 (S136R). |
Orbit: |
921.3 km x 1,162.4 km x 41°
x 108 min.
940 km x 1,318 km x 41° x 108 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Explorer XXVII
(BE-C) satellite was successfully launched. Primary mission of the 60-kg,
windmill-shaped satellite was geodetic measurement: irregularities in the
Earth’s gravitational field would be mapped by analysis of the Doppler
shift of radio signals from the spacecraft. As a secondary mission, Explorer
XXVII would provide data related to ionospheric studies and would evaluate
further the use of laser techniques in deriving orbital and geodetic information
and for deep space communication. All systems were operating as planned.
* * * * *
Current overview: Explorer XXVII was a
60-kg science satellite which map irregularities of Earth’s gravitational
field, continue collection of global electron counts for cross sections
of the ionosphere, and continue experiments with laser for tracking, geodetic,
and communications purpose. It was a 45 cm x 30 cm octagonal satellite,
with 4 solar panels extending like windmill blades. It carried as science
instrument magnetometers, laser signal detector and two bar magnets. Explorer
XXVII was the second in series of five satellites in geodetic research.
Its results would supplement those of Explorer
XXII (making same measurements a 80° inclination). Electron count
experiment involved 86 ground stations in 36 countries, largest international
effort to date. Still in orbit. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 207, 583 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Discoverer 90 / KH-4A
19 / CORONA 94
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1019 / CORONA J-4 / OPS
5023 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #57 ; 1965-033A ; 536th spacecraft,
1,330th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Transtage 6
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #58 ; 1965-034A ; 537th spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
6 May 1965 at 15h00 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral Air Force Base's LC-20, by a Titan 3A (3A-6). |
Orbit: |
Initial: 174 km x 201 km x 88.1
min.
2nd orbital firing: 185 km x 2,829 km
3rd orbital firing: 2,784 km x 2,806 km
4th orbital firing: 2,777 km x 3,730 km x
32.07° x 157 min.
2,775 km x 3,730 km x 32.07° x 157 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: USAF Titan III-A
rocket was launched in a maneuverability test in which the third stage
(transtage), carrying two satellites, executed a series of consecutive
and intricate maneuvers. Primary goal of the mission was four separate
ignitions of the transtage’s engines - a feat never before attempted. First
firing, after burnout of the first two stages, lasted 296 seconds and injected
the 3-ton rocket-payload assembly into an orbit of 174 km x 201 km, and
88.1 min. period. After one orbit, about 90 minutes after launch, the third
stage ignited a second time, for 37 seconds, driving the stage upward into
an elliptical orbit of 185 km x 2,829 km. Two and one-half hours later,
transtage's engines burned a third time, for 27 seconds, to circularize
the orbit at 2,784 km x 2,806 km. Seven hours after launch, the transtage
was fired a fourth time, driving it into a final elliptical orbit.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
In July 1964, it was reported that nine payloads
had been chosen for flight aboard the research and development launchs
of the USAF Titan III. Five of the experiments were said to be experimental
communications satellites built by the MIT Lincoln Laboratory, and the
sixth a backup communications satellite from Lincoln Lab. The remaining
three were scientific satellites using the modified Arents spacecraft shell.
To avoid confusion with the defunct Arents program, the latter spacecraft
were to be called Orbiting Vehicle 2 (OV-2). |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics, 1964, p. 269 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 219-20, 584 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
LES 2
Spacecraft: |
Lincoln Experimental Satellite |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #59 ; 1965-034B ; 538th spacecraft,
1,360th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (technology) |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
6 May 1965 at 15h00 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral Air Force Base's LC-20, by a Titan 3A (3A-6). |
Orbit: |
2,822 km x 15,076 km x 31.35°
x
315 min.
2,821 km x 14,970 km x 31.35° x 315.3
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: Thirty seconds
after shutdown of the transtage’s 3rd firing, a 37-kg Lincoln Laboratory
experimental communications satellite (LES II), equipped with its own rocket
motor to shoot itself into a higher elliptical orbit, was spring-ejected
from the stage. / LES II was a 37-kg Experimental communications satellite.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 219-20, 584 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
LCS 1
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #60 ; 1965-034C ; 539th spacecraft,
1,361st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Radar calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
6 May 1965 at 15h00 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral Air Force Base's LC-20, by a Titan 3A (3A-6). |
Orbit: |
2,784 km x 2,806 km.
2,770 km x 2,782 km x 32.11° x 145.6
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: Then, 42 second
after LES II was released, a 113 cm-diameter, 35-kg hollow aluminum radar
calibration sphere (LCS I) was ejected from the transtage. LCS I was to
remain in near-circular orbit.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 219-20, 584 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 66 / Zenit-2
#27
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-2 11F61 No. 27 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #61 ; 1965-035A ; 540th spacecraft,
1,362nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Luna 5
Spacecraft: |
E-6 No. 10 SA |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #62 ; 1965-036A ; 541st spacecraft,
1,366th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
Launch: |
9 May 1965 at 7h55 UTC, from
Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-1, by an A-2-e/"Molniya" (8K78M U103-30). |
Orbit: |
Impacted the Moon in the Sea
of Clouds. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
12 May 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Luna V, a 1,475-kg
instrumented moon probe, was successfully launched by U.S.S.R. on an undisclosed
mission. According to TASS announcement, the probe was launched by multi-stage
rocket into a parking orbit and then fired toward the moon. All onboard
equipment was said to be functioning normally and a U.S.S.R. station tracking
the probe was receiving “scientific information.” TASS reported that Luna
V was “moving along a trajectory close to the planned one.” At 22:00 Moscow
time, the probe was 1110,000 km. from Earth. Sir Bernard Lovell, director
of the radiotelescope facility at Jodrell Bank, England, said that: “We
have been expecting the Russians to make an attempt to achieve a soft landing
of an instrumented package on the moon for some time now.”
Luna V “hit the
Moon in the area of the Sea of Clouds” at 22:l0Moscow time, 15:10 EDT,
TASS announced. The release continued: “During the flight and the approach
of the station to the Moon, a great deal of information was obtained which
is necessary for the further elaboration of a system for soft landing on
the Moon’s surface.” The announcement revealed no further details of the
landing. Western experts saw evidence that the Soviets had attempted a
soft landing and failed.
On 13 May 1965,
Soviet engineer T. Borisov suggested that cause of Luna V’s apparent failure
to soft land on the moon might have been failure of the braking rockets
to fire “precisely when needed,” the New York Times reported. Borisov pointed
out that Earth stations could not help the automatic equipment during this
phase because it takes 2½ seconds for radio signals to make round-trip
between Earth and Moon.
A lunar dust cloud
produced by braking rockets of Luna V as it attempted a soft landing on
the Moon was photographed by the observatory at Rodewisch, East Germany,
said the observatory’s director in an interview with AND, East German press
agency. The tracking station had made photographs of the lunar approach
of the spacecraft at 15-second intervals. At the moment of best visibility
- 22:15, Moscow time - the dust cloud was 225 km long and 80 km wide. It
had disappeared by 22:21, Moscow time. This was the first indication that
braking rockets aboard the spacecraft had been oprative. Soviet announcement
had given landing time for Luna V as 22:l0. Pictures of the dust cloud
were published in Izvestia.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 222, 227, 230, 232, 234, 235, 584 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Discoverer 91 / KH-4A
20 / CORONA 95
Spacecraft: |
OPS 8431 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #63 ; 1965-037A ; 542nd spacecraft,
1,374th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
P-35-12 / DAPP 12
Spacecraft: |
OPS 8386 • DMSP-Block-4A F3
Data Acquisition and Processing Program
Defense Meteorological Satellite Program |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #64 ; 1965-038A ; 543rd spacecraft,
1,377th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Pegasus 2
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #65 ; 1965-039A ; 544th spacecraft,
1,381th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Micrometeroids studies |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
25 May 1965 at 3h35 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-37B, by a Saturn I (SA-8). |
Orbit: |
509 km x 744 km x 31.8° x
97 min.
505 km x 750 km x 31.76°x 97.29 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
3 November 1979. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Saturn I (SA-8)
launch vehicle orbited a 10.5 tons payload of which 1,450 kg was the Pegasus
II meteoroid detection satellite and 4,200 kg was Apollo boilerplate command
and service module (BP-26). (Total weight placed into orbit: 15,330 kg,
comprizong: S-IV (Saturn I’s 2nd stage): 9,000 kg, Apollo boilerplate:
4,405 kg, and Pegasus II, 1,450 kg.) This was the ninth successful
test in nine flights for Saturn I. After injection into orbit, the Apollo
boilerplate was jettisoned into a separate orbit and a motor-driven device
extended 29 x 4.3 metres wing-like panels on Pegasus II, exposing 214 sq.
m. of instrumented surface. The satellite was attached to the Saturn’s
S-IV second stage and would remained so during it lifetime. Each
wing consisted of several frames hinged together and providing mountings
for a total of 208 detector panels. As particules collided with the surface,
the penetrations would be registered and reported to Earth. Primary purpose
of the flight was to gather information frequency of meteoroids encountered
in the near-Earth environment for use in design of future manned and unmanned
spacecratt. Pegasus II, an improved version of Pegasus
I, would be visible to the naked eye under favorable conditions neart
dawn and dusk.
Pegasus II mission
objective were: study distribution, size, and velocity of meteoroids in
near Earth orbit, and continue development of Saturn I launch vehicle.
By 15 September 1965, Pegasus II had recorded meteoroid hits penetrating
its 1,5-mm, 8-mmm and 16-mm thickness panels at the respective rates of
70, 5,5 and 1,45 per sqare meter per year.
Meteoroids probably
would not be unduly hazardous to spacecraft flying for short periods in
the near-Earth environment, a NASA report indicated on 12 August 1965,
based on data from Explorer’s XVI and XXIII and Pegasus I and II. Pegasus
II, launched May 25, 1965, was returning useful data from all three thicknesses
of panels and had registered 61 penetrations. The higher frequency of penetrations
recorded by Pegasus II was thought to have been caused by a meteoroid shower.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 193, 247, 310-1, 376, 585 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Apollo BP-26 / Saturn
SA-8
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #66 ; 1965-039B ; 545th spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 67 / Zenit-4
#7
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 10 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #67 ; 1965-040A ; 546th spacecraft,
1,367th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
KH-7 18 / Gambit-1 18
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 18 / GAMBIT SV 968 /
OPS 5236 ; AFP-206 [F18] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #68 ; 1965-041A ; 547th spacecraft,
1,386th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
OV 1-3
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #69 ; 1965 7th loss ; 548th
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Explorer 28 / IMP 3
Spacecraft: |
IMP C ; IMP stands for Interplanetary
Monitoring Probe |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #70 ; 1965-042A ; 549th spacecraft,
1,388th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Earth upper atmosphere studies |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
29 May 1965 at 12h00 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-17B, by a Delta DSV-3C (Thor Delta C 441 / Delta 31). |
Orbit: |
193 km x 264,040 km x 34°
x 5 d., 22 hr.
190 km x 264,000 km x 34° x 8,250 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
4 July 1968. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: NASA successfully
launched Explorer XXVIII Interplanetary Monitoring Probe (IMP-C). A slightly
longer than planned burn by the third stage engines placed the 60-kg probe
into an orbit with 264,040 km apogee, instead of the scheduled orbit of
209,300 km apogee. The spacecraft was equipped with devices to report on
the Earth's magnetic field, cosmic rays, and the solar wind throughout
its highly elliptical orbit. Confused telemetry signals from the Explorer
XXVIII for 3½ hrs. after launching made it seem the spacecraft had
not separated from the third stage of the booster; however, later signals
indicated that all spacecraft systems were operating normally, that separation
had occurred. The IMP series began with Explorer
XVIII (IMP-A) launched in 1963.
Explorer XXVIII
is a 59-kg science satellite which studied magnetosphere, cosmic radiation
and solar wind. Spacecraft was a 71-cm diameter by 20 cm octagon,
with a 1.8-metre boom deploying magnetometer, 2 80-cm booms deploying magnetometer,
4 cosmic-ray detectors; 3 solar wind analyzers, and 4 solar paddles mounting
solar cells. Slightly long burn of the Thor-Delta put Explorer XXVIII in
even more elliptical orbit than planned (130,000 km instead of 210,000
km apogee). This was 3rd in IMP series (others were Explorer XVIII and
XXII.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 257-8, 585 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Gemini 4
Spacecraft: |
Gemini spacecraft 4 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #71 ; 1965-043A ; 550th spacecraft,
1,390th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Piloted spacecraft |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
3 June 1965 at 15h15 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-19, by a Titan 2 (GT-4). |
Orbit: |
161 km x 283.2 km x 94 min.
160 km x 296 km x 32.5° x 88.9 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Recovered: |
7 June 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Gemini IV was
launched on 3 June 1965 at 11:16 EDT and began the four-day space flight
of astronauts James A. McDivitt (Maj., USAF) and Edward H. White, II (Maj.,
USAF), who would make 62 revolutions around the Earth in 97 hrs. 56 min.
Eight minutes after lift-off, traveling at 28,265 km/h, the spacecraft
was inserted inton orbit.
Viewers in Great
Britain and at least 11 Western European nations were able to watch the
Gemini 4 lift-off live via Early Bird I satellite. Picture reception was
reportedly clear. ComSatCorp, cooperating with European ground station
owners, arranged for free use of Early Bird I between 8:00 a.m. and 12
noon EDT.
A home-made U.S.
flag, carried by astronauts Virgil Grissom and John Young on Gemini III
flight, was hoisted at NASA Manned Spacecraft Center the moment James McDivitt
and Edward White II went into orbit. Flag would be flown only while
astronauts were in spaceflight.
In an article suggesting
the possibility of catastrophe during the GT-4 flight, William Hines
had said in the Washington Evening Star: “The truth is that the
only ‘first’ the United States has a chance to achieve in Gemini 4 is ‘first
casualties in space, and nobody (including the Russians) seek this dubious
record.”
Commenting on the
planned rendezvous, he said: “… the other - and more questionable added
spectacular on the present mission - is a risky business of unknown proportions
… There are several purely technical objections to this exercise. First,
it is not part of the original Gemini 4 mission, but an afterthought. Second,
the spacecraft was not built for rendezvous. Third, the rocket was never
envisioned as a target vehicle and is uncontrollable in space…
“But if tragedy
should strike as a result of something that happens on the first few orbits
of Gemini 4, how will the responsibility be fixed: as pilot error … or
politician’s error?”
Original plans had
been for Gemini IV to be maneuvered within 7.5 metres of the burned out
second stage of the Titan II booster rocket and for White to approach and
possibly touch it during his extravehicular mission. But three hours into
flight, ground stations reported that excessive tumbling of the second
stage had increased atmospheric drag and that it was orbiting 51 km ahead
of and 8 km below Gemini IV. Mission Director Christopher Kraft confirmed
Command Pilot McDivitt’s suggestion to abandon further attempts at rendezvous
because of a potential fuel shortage.
White’s extravehicular
activity, planned for the second orbit, was delayed until the third to
allow astronauts more preparation time. It began at 15:45 EDT. The
cabin was depressurized; White, equipped with tether carrying oxygen and
communication and with chest pack for emergency oxygen supply, emerged
from the spacecraft just past Hawaii. Carrying a modified 35 mm. single-lens
reflex camera loaded with color film, and propelled by a hand-held, oxygen-jet
gun, he went three times to the full length of his 7.5-m tether and then
returned, using the gun to halt his motion and prevent his hitting the
spaceship. When the gas supply in the gun was depleted, he returned to
the spacecraft by gently tugging on the tether line. At one point. McDivitt
exclaimed: “You smeared my windshield, you dirty dog.”
Flight plans had
called for a ten-minute walk in space but White remained outside the spacecraft
for 22 minutes. He experienced no disorientation during his “walk.” When
he finally heeded commands to return to the capsule, he had difficulty
closing the hatch and decided not to reopen it to jettison excess equipment.
“It’s the saddest moment of my life,” White said as he reentered the spacecraft.
On June 5, during the 17th orbit, the astronauts
spoke to their wives at MSC. During the 20th orbit, McDivitt spotted a
satellite with “big arms sticking out.” He was unable to identify it positively.
(ABC science editor Jules Bergman reported that the satellite sighted was
a secret U.S. military reconnaiSsance satellite with cameras. He said that
space officials had been unable to identify it because DOD would not admit
the existence of a U.S. reconnaissance satellite.) On June 6, during
the 48th orbit, trouble developed with the spacecraft’s computer and attempts
to repair it with the aid of ground instructions failed. The malfunctioning
computer made it necessary for Gemini IV to reenter on a ballistic trajectory.
Throughout the flight,
the daily routine of the astronauts included eating, exercise, and performance
of medical and scientific experiments. They alternated rest periods. During
12 of the 62 orbits, when Gemini IV passed through a heavy radiation area
called the South Atlantic anomaly, astronauts McDivitt and White switched
on radiation and magnetic field measuring devices to take readings inside
and outside the spacecraft and near their bodies. They also attempted to
improve the knowledge of the Earth’s terrain through high-quality color
photographs; to measure with instruments the electrostatic change that
accumulates in space and on objects in space; to better define the magnitude
and direction of the Earth’s geomagnetic field; to test the accuracy of
part of a prototype navigational system for future space capsules; to measure
heartbeats to try to determine the effects of prolonged weightlessness
on functioning of the brain; to determine the effects of limited exercise
in space through use of a tension cord; to take high-resolution photographs
of cloud formations over the earth to aid weathermen in improved forcasting
from weather satellites; to determine more exactly the elevation of the
earth’s atmosphere and the layers through use of filtered film; and to
determine if long periods of weithtlessness might make the bones brittle.
On June 7, to begin
reentry, McDivitt fired a 45-kg thrusting rocket for 2 minutes 41 seconds
– one second too long - to guide the capsule into an orbit with 252 km
apogee and 160 km perigee. Twelve minutes later, McDivill fired the
retrorockets; 2½ minutes later, he placed the spacecraft into a
slow rotation to reduce reentry dispersion. Communications with the spacecraft
then ceased for about 4 minutes as ion sheat blackout phase of reentry
beagan. Gemini IV entered the final stage of reentry at 13:07 EDT when
the stabilizing chute emerged and dampted the oscillation of the descending
craft. The main parachute opened shortly afterward and slowed the
spacecraft for its final landing at 13:13 EDT, about 725 km east of Cape
Kennedy. The landing was 40 65 km off target because of the one-second
error in the firing of the thrusting rockets and one-second delay in the
firing of the retrorockets.
Fifteen minutes
after splashdown, Navy frogmen, lowered into the water by helicopter, placed
a flotation collar around the capsule. Before egressing from the spacecraft
to be hoisted to helicopter, astronauts took biomedical data on themselves.
About 40 minutes later, Majors McDivitt and White were landed by helicopter
on the flight deck of the carrier Wasp. They were taken immediately to
the ship’s sick bay for postflight examinations.
Dr. Charles Berry,
Chief Flight Surgeon for the astronauts, said after the examinations: “We
have knocked down an awful lot of straw men. We had been told that we would
have an unconscious astronaut after four days of weightlessness. Well,
they’re not. We were told that the astronaut would experience vertigo,
disorientation when he stepped out of that spaceship. The most serious
problem was fatigue. “Both men were bushed,” said Dr. Berry. Maj. McDivitt
had a few flecks of caked blood in his nostrils, caused by the dryness
of the mucous membranes from inhaling pure oxygen for so long. X-rays taken
of the astronauts’ little fingers and heel bones both before and after
the flight to determine if long exposure to weightlessness would cause
a substantial loss of calcium were being studied.
The Gemini IV flight
had included at least two world firsts: a record length for two-man flights
and the first time a pilot had maneuvered outside a ship with a propulsion
gun, which gave him control over his movements. American astronauts had
flown a total of 10 days, 19 hours and 34 minutes. in space; Soviet astronauts
had accumulated 21 days, 3 hours and 16 minutes.
[Note: the longest one-man piloted spaceflight,
Vostok 5, was 21 hours longer than Gemini IV; as Soviet’s 3- and 2-man
spaceflight (Voskhod 1 and 2) lasted only one day.]
An analysis of worldwide
press reactions to the successful Gemini IV flight indicated that most
newspapers took the occasion to call for US.-Soviet cooperation in space
ventures. “That this [cooperation] is unlikely shows how far our politics
lag behind our technology,” Britain’s Manchester Guardian said. Dutch newspapers
joined in asking for cooperation in space and Trouw said the duplication
of effort by the Soviet Union and the United States “is a waste of money
and know-how.” The West Berlin press highly praised the U.S. policy of
reporting the Gemini flight as it was taking place. Swedish newspapers
refrained from any comment amid a wave of anti-American sentiment over
Viet Nam and the Dominican Republic. The Hindustani Times commented: “It
is a pity that the two nations [US. and Soviet Union] are going about the
job with such secrecy. The time has come for both nations to pool their
resources and make the projected attempt on the moon a truly human adventure.”
President Johnson,
calling Gemini 4’s, said: ”… We can hope and pray that the time will come
when all men of all nations will join together to explore space together
and walk side by side toward peace.”
Probable reasons
for the Gemini IV crew’s failure to achieve rendezvous with the booster
-- based on runs in a rendezvous simulator -- were listed: (1) visual rendezvous
requires extended ground practice; (2) maneuver is nearly impossible without
radar if the spacecraft and target are more than 1,500 metres apart; (3)
more fuel than originally expected was required.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 27 July 1964, NASA named Capt. James A.
McDivitt (USAF) and Capt. Edward H. White II (USAF) as pilot and copilot
for the second manned space flight of Project Gemini (GT-4), a four-day
Earth-orbital mission in early 1965. Astronauts named as backup crew for
the flight were Maj. Frank Borman (USAF) and Lt. Cdr. James A. Lovell,
Jr. (USN) . All four were ”second generation” astronauts selected for the
NASA program in September 1962.
At a press conference
on 29 July 1964, Kenneth S. Kleinknecht, Deputy Project Manager of Project
Gemini, stated that an experiment assigned to GT-4, scheduled for early
1965, would involve the first exposure of an astronaut to the hazards of
outer space without full space vehicle protection. He said that the experiment
would involve “stepping into space,” but modified this later to say that
it might involve nothing more than the crewman’s opening up the spacecraft
hatch and standing up in his seat.
On 22 March 1965,
NASA Administrator James E. Webb was questioned by Sen. Walter F. Mondale
(D-Minn.) on when the first U.S. extravehicular activity was planned, and
he replied: “Within the next year. We are not sure on which Gemini flight
we will do it as yet.” On 25 March, he reported that an American astronaut
probably would be able to open his spacecraft and partly emerge from the
cabin during the GT-5 flight. Mr. Webb said under questioning that there
might be some possibility of achieving this in the next Gemini flight,
but that GT-5 was more likely.
Aviation Week &
Space Technology reports, on 5 April 1965, that an equipment modification
to permit opening of the hatch on Gemini 4 had been successfully tested.
Hoses connecting the spacesuits to the spacecraft’s environmental control
system were lengthened to permit the astronaut to stand and partially emerge
through the hatch. NASA had not yet approved a spacecraft-depressurization
and hatchopening exercise for the two-man spaceflight.
On 19 April, Edward
L. Hays, chief of crew systems at NASA Manned Spacecraft Center, announced
that the crew of the Gemini GT-4 flight would wear the qualified Extravehicular
Activity (EVA) spacesuit during their flight.
On 29 April 1965,
Dr. George E. Mueller, NASA Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight,
said that although extravehicular activity was not planned for Gemini astronauts
until GT-5, “we are working hard at trying to qualify the space suit and
the hatch itself to see whether we can accelerate that date.” If
their spacesuits and the spacecraft’s hatch passed tests in time, Astronaut
Edward H. White would lean halfway out of the capsule for perhaps 15 minutes
on flight GT-4, scheduled for early June. He and Astronaut James A. McDivitt
would attempt to orbit the Earth 63 times in 98 hours.
On 13 May 1965,
Gemini GT-4 countdown rehearsal at KSC was delayed because of a minor fueling
problem. Launch of the GT~4 mission was scheduled for June 3.
On 22 May 1965,
the Gemini 4 manned spaceflight had been scheduled for June 3, NASA announced.
The four-day flight would last about 97 hrs. 50 min., and would increase
the US’s hours of manned space flight to about 257 hrs. No decision had
been made about opening the two-man spacecraft and letting one astronaut
stand exposed to space.
On 25 May 1965,
it was announced that, during the planned 4-day flight, astronaut Edward
White would leave the Gemini 4 spacecraft for 12 minunites, “if conditions
are favorable,” NASA officials said the decision had been delayed
“So final qualification tests could be completed on the spacecraft, spacesuit,
secondary life support pack and umbilical.”
The 12-layer protective
suit that White would wear had been worn for more than 200 hrs. and White
himself had worn it during more than 60 hrs. of tests. Among other things,
it had had pellets fired at it at a speed of 27,000 km/h to simulate the
impact of small meteoroids.
The flight’s command
pilot, James McDivitt, would not open his hatch but would take movies of
White through a spacecraft window. White would take a 35-mm. still camera
loaded with color film on his “walk” in space. Although he had practiced
acrobatics, he had no planned program and would “use his own judgment as
to what to do while outside the ship.” Exit from the spacecraft was planned
for the second orbit.
On 27 May 1965,
it was reported that President Johnson was disappointed that the two-man
Gemini-Titan 4 spacecraft scheduled for June 3 launching, had no cameras
aboard for simultaneous TV transmission of the space walk. The President
had hoped that at completion of the four-day flight by Astronauts McDivitt
and White, the U.S. would have pictures similar to those released by the
Soviet Union after Voskhod II flight. TV cameras had been sacrificed for
experimental instruments.
On 28 May 1965,
Dr. George Mueller, NASA Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight,
outlined the plan for the flight: When the Gemini 4 spacecraft separated
from the second stage, six minutes after launching, Maj. James A. McDivitt,
as command pilot, would fire jet thrusters to hold a tight formation with
the spent stage, which would trail the astronauts by about 100 metres.
Throughout the first orbit, the astronauts would make a complete check
of all their systems. At the start of the second orbit they would
begin preparing for Maj. White’s emergence by unpacking life support packs,
the maneuvering unit, and the 7.5-metre lifeline. Sweeping over the Indian
Ocean during this orbit, they would begin to depressurize the spacecraft
cabin and pressurize their spacesuits. Over Hawaii, Maj. McDivitt would
maneuver the spacecraft to within 7.5 metres of the second stage. Maj.
White would open his hatch and, at a point west of Guaymas, Mexico, he
would leave the vehicle. That would be about three hours after launching.
Using the hand-gun
maneuvering unit, Maj. White would slowly rotate toward the second stage,
which is 8.2 metres long and 3 metres in diameter and would be equipped
with two flashing lights. The astronaut would carry a 35-mm movie camera
to take pictures of the Earth, star background, the booster, and the spacecraft.
After 10 minutes, over Florida, Maj. White would begin returning to the
spacecraft. The cabin would be repressurized and the suits depressurized.
Then Maj. McDivitt would fire thrusters so that the spacecraft would move
about 26 km away from the booster.
During the fifth
orbit, about three hours later, the Gemini again would be maneuvered so
that it would approach the second stage high over Africa. The craft would
close to within 3 metres this time to determine how well they can approach
an orbiting craft, sighting on the flashing lights.
On 15 June 1965,
Dr. George E. Mueller, NASA Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight,
said that it would take “a great deal of effort over a number of years”
for the United States to achieve first place in space and warned it would
be “a mistake to believe” that the successful Gemini IV spaceflight had
“overcome a lead of several years” held by the Soviet Union. He said “the
most important result” of the Gemini IV flight might be the condition of
the astronauts upon their return, based on the preliminary medical examinations
of astronauts McDivitt and White. [Assessment of Dr. Mueller was wrong
as history will show that, with Gemini 4, U.S. equalled U.S.S.R. and will
overtaked it with Gemini V.] |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; National Space Science
Data Center's ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics, 1964, p. 263, 265 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 141-2, 152, 170, 190, 209, 229, 244, 248,
254, 255-6, 260, 265-7, 268, 271, 272, 273, 282-3, 322, 586 ; TRW Space
Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p. 91 ; Gunter's
;
Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
White : a human-tethered
"spacecraft"
|
On 3 June 1965, astronaut Ed White became
a "human satellite" when he exited from his Gemini spacecraft, making the
second "spacewalk". But, contrary to future spacewalkers, he was not entirely
autonomous from his spacecraft; his spacesuit nearly qualifies as a semi-autonomus
spacecraft. |
|
.
Luna 6
Spacecraft: |
E-6 No. 8 SA |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #72 ; 1965-044A ; 551st spacecraft,
1,395th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
Launch: |
8 June 1965 at 7h40 UTC, from
Baykonur Cosmodrome, by an A-2-e/"Molniya" (8K78M U103-31). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Luna VI, 1,440
kg instrumented Moon probe, was successfully launched on a trajectory toward
the Moon. All onboard equipment was said to be functioning normally and
the trip was scheduled to last about three and a half days, according to
TASS announcement. On 10 June 1965, TASS announced that Luna VI would miss
the moon by 160,000 km because of an unsuccessful midcourse maneuver. Engine
used to adjust the spacecraft’s trajectory could not be switched off, causing
a deviation from the planned course.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 272, 274 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Discoverer 92 / KH-4A
21 / CORONA 96
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1020 / CORONA J-20 / OPS
8425 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #73 ; 1965-045A ; 552nd spacecraft,
1,396th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 68 / Zenit-2
#28
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-2 11F61 No. 29 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #74 ; 1965-046A ; 553rd spacecraft,
1,404th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Transtage 7
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #75 ; 1965-047A ; 554th spacecraft,
1,412nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
18 June 1965 at 14h00 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral Air Force Base's LC-40, by a Titan 3C (3C-7). |
Orbit: |
177.7 km x 187 km x32.175°
x 88.1 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
29 June 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: USAF’s Titan III-C,
launched from the Eastern Test Range, became the most powerful rocket known
to have been lofted and the first liquid-fuel spacecraft to be lifted from
its pad with solid-fuel rockets. Two 3-metre-diameter, 26-metre-long solid
strap-on boosters generated a peak thrust of 1,200 tons seconds after ignition
to propel the liquid-fuel core vehicle to an altitude of 39 km. Less than
two minutes after lift-off, the boosters were jettisoned by firing of 16
small rockets. The liquid-fuel engines of the 39-metre three-stage core
vehicle then fired a 215-tons thrust burst that injected the vehicle’s
third stage (transtage) with 13,285 kg lead ballast and instrument payload
into orbit. This was the heaviest payload ever orbited. A series of twelve
Titan III-C tests was projected. Most powerful rocket previously launched
was NASA’s Saturn I, which produced 680 tons thrust. The most powerful
known Soviet rocket, which orbited Voskhod I and Voskhod II, had been rated
by American experts at 360 to 410 tons thrust.
The success of the
Titan IIIC flight spur a burst of competitions between DoD and NASA,
On 19 June 1965, an editorial in the Cleveland Plain Dealer comments
on NASA and the Air Force duplicate efforts in the parallel development
of rockets. “But yesterday’s dramatic blastoff of the triple-barrelled
Titan 3-C by the Air Force, coming closely on the heels of NASA’s sensationa1
Gemini performance, indicates the competition, thus far is beneficial to
both.”
And “USAF has come
up with something for NASA to reckon with’, commented William Hines, concerning
the Titan III-C success, in an article in the Washington Evening Star:
“It is the Air Force position -- which NASA will now be forced to try to
disprove -- that anything Saturn IB can do, Titan III-C can do better.
“The Air Force,
for its part, must now try to prove Titan III-C’s reliability over the
long haul … Gen. Joseph S. Bleymaier Jr., head of the Titan III-C program,
said it is his goal to make every one of the 12 shots of the Titan I!!-c
deve!c?pmeIlt series a 100% success.
“Equally important
with reliability is cost. Bleymaier says the Titan III-C can be produced
in quantity for $12.8 million, or just a little more than half the $22
million it is estimated NASA’s Saturn IB will cost. Titan III-C’s $800
million development cost is but a fraction of what NASA will have spent
to get the first Saturn IB off the ground.”
“It is time now
to put the manned military control of space on a crash basis equal in priority
to the Apollo program,” said Rep. John W. Wydler (R-N.Y.), member of the
House Science and Astronautics Committee, in a letter to the editor in
the New York Times. He suggested the following steps be taken: “The
first M.O.L. flight is scheduled from two and one half to three years from
now. This should be speeded up at least a year and the necessary sacrifices
made to achieve it. The Gemini capsules required for the M.O.L. project
should be ordered at once. To achieve our goals effectively the manned
earth orbiting program should be placed under military control…
“I believe the only
way the Department of Defense can meet its responsibilities in ‘near space’
is to assume direction of the manned earth orbiting program. It should
reorganize the U.S. Air Force into the U.S. Aerospace Force and make it
truly that…
“The decision we
must make is not whether there will be military control of space but rather
whether that control will be Russian or our own…”
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 288-9, 290-1 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
91 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Transit O-4 / NNS O-4
/ Transit 5B-6
Spacecraft: |
OPS 8480 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #76 ; 1965-048A ; 555th spacecraft,
1,420th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Navigation |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 69 / Zenit-4
#8
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 4 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #77 ; 1965-049A ; 556th spacecraft,
1,421st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
KH-7 19 / Gambit-1 19
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 19 / GAMBIT SV 969 /
OPS 5501 / AFP-206 [F19] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #78 ; 1965-050B ; 557th spacecraft,
1,424th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Hitchhiker 9
Spacecraft: |
OPS 6749 / [EHH B2] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #79 ; 1965-050A ; 558th spacecraft,
1,422nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Electronic intelligence |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 70
Spacecraft: |
DS-A1 No. 7 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #80 ; 1965-052A ; 559th spacecraft,
1,431st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Military Earth upper atmosphere studies &
technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
2 July 1965 at 4h04 UTC, from
Kapustin Yar Cosmodrome's LC-86/1, by a Kosmos B-1 (63S1). |
Orbit: |
229 km x 1,154 km x 48.8°
x 98.3 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
18 December 1966. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Cosmos LXX was
successfully launched containing scientific equipment “for continuing the
outer space research in conformity with the program announced by TASS on
March 16th, 1962,” a radio system for precise measurement of the orbital
elements, and a radio telemetry system for sending data to Earth. Equipment
was functioning normally.
Bochum Observatory (W. Germany) had reported
picking up signals different from those of the Cosmos series. Heinz Kaminski,
head of the Institute for Satellite and Space Research at Bochum, West
Germany, said he tracked .two Soviet space satellites in orbit although
the U.S.S.R. announced the launching of only one: “Apparently *the Russians
are preparing for a space rendezvous-perhaps between these two satellites
or between a manned space ship and a satellite in parking orbit.” No confirmation
of the Bochum report was available from other sources.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 311 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
92 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Tiros 10
Spacecraft: |
Tiros OT1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #81 ; 1965-051A ; 560th spacecraft,
1,430th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorology |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
2 July 1965 at 4h07 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-17B, by a Delta DSV-3C (Thor Delta C 415 / Delta 32). |
Orbit: |
737 km x 832 km x 81.4° x
100.6 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: TIROS X meteorological
satellite was launched into a near-perfect sun-synchronous orbit from which
it would photograph tropical storm breeding areas. The spacecraft at first
was spinning too fast for picture-taking because of inability to command
activation of an automatic slowdown device. A more intense ground signal
sent during the second orbit activated the device, slowing the satellite’s
spin rate from 138 rpm to about 13 rpm. TIROS X would photograph the hurricane-breeding
area between 70° north and 30° south latitude, about 60 to 80 percent
of the earth. Its two vidicon cameras would take more than 400 pictures
daily. It was the 10th successful Tiros launched by NASA in as many attempts.
TIROS X was funded by the Weather Bureau, while the previous nine were
NASA research and development spacecraft. It was one of three satellites
purchased by Weather Bureau in 1963 “to be used to assure continuity of
satellite observations for operational purposes.”
Four TIROS meteorological
satellites observing Hurricane Betsy were providing the most extensive
picture coverage of a storm ever obtained in space. TIROS X had photographed
Betsy on 27 August 1965 before she reached hurricane strength; since then
TIROS VII, VIII, and IX had been photographing her about eight times daily.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 310, 420, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
92 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
KH-7 20 / Gambit-1 20
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 20 / GAMBIT SV 970 /
OPS 5810 / AFP-206 [F20] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #82 ; 1965 8th loss ; 561st
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos / Zenit-2 #29
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-2 11F61 No. 28 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #83 ; 1965 9th loss ; 562nd
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 71
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #84 ; 1965-053A ; 563rd spacecraft,
1,441st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 72
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #85 ; 1965-053B ; 564th spacecraft,
1,442nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 73
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #86 ; 1965-053C ; 565th spacecraft,
1,443rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 74
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #87 ; 1965-053D ; 566th spacecraft,
1,444th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 75
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #88 ; 1965-053E ; 567th spacecraft,
1,445th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Proton 1
Spacecraft: |
N-4 No. 1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #89 ; 1965-054A ; 568th spacecraft,
1,466th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Earth upper atmosphere studies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union |
|
|
Launch: |
16 July 1965 at 11h16 UTC, from
Baykonu Cosmodrome's LC-81L, by a D/Proton (8K82 207, N-4 No. 1). |
Orbit: |
190 km x 627 km x 63.5° x
92 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
11 October 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Proton I, a scientific
space station, was orbited by the U.S.S.R. with a “powerful new booster,”
TASS announced. The 12,190-kg payload was claimed to be heaviest ever launched.
In addition to scientific and measuring instruments, the space station
was equipped with special equipment for the study of cosmic particles of
super-high energies and a radio transmitter. TASS said: “In order to insure
realization of the planned space research program, a powerful new booster
rocket has been developed in the Soviet Union.”
Commenting on the Soviet launching, Dr. Edward
C. Welsh, Executive Secretary of the National Aeronautics and Space Council,
said he was “impressed but not astonished” by the Russian accomplishment.
We have been predicting for some time that they would deve!op into the
space station field,” he said. “We have anticipated that they would practice
rendezvous and docking before they developed what they said was a space
station, but they haven’t followed that particular line.”
“Soviet propaganda
needs in the wake of Mariner 4’s flight to Mars [on July 15] appear to
have been influential in determining the timing of the latest Soviet space
shots,” wrote Harry Schwartz in the New York Times on 18 July 1965. He
continued: “Moscow’s decision to send up last Friday two rockets -- one
putting five small satellites into orbit and the second orbiting the heaviest
man-made object yet put into space -- seems to Western observers to be
a transparent Soviet effort to counteract thepropaganda defeat Moscow suffered
as a result of Mariner 4’s historic voyage. That defeat was all the greater
because of the failure of the Soviet Mars probe, Zond, sent on the same
journey at roughly the same time Mariner 4 was launched.”
Observers in Moscow
believed that the Soviet Union would shortly launch a gigantic spacecraft
with as many as four to six people aboard, said an article in Poland’s
Trybura
Ludu published on 18 July 1965. The spacecraft would most likely be
commanded by one of the experienced cosmonauts and would have a weight
of over 12 tons. It would be placed in orbit by the booster which launched
Proton I. The latter, according to the correspondent, probably used solid
fuel. The correspondent speculated that the spacecraft would remain in
orbit one week and that several cosmonauts would take a “walk in space”
simultaneously
Prof. S. N. Vernov,
corresponding member of U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, noted in TASS interview
the unusual weight of Proton I and its special equipment for studying cosmic
particles of super-high energy. He said the method for counting the particles,
worked out eight years ago by Prof. N. L. Grigorov, had made it possible
to determine the total energy of each particle separately. Scientists had
hesitated to use the method in space because of the weight of the equipment.
This problem had been solved with the creation of a more powerful booster,
he said.
On 22 July 1965,
Soviet professor V. V. Fedynskiy said that Proton I had demonstrated the
possibility of getting more powerful spaceships into orbit, which, if necessary,
could lift into space a crew and a large quantity of research equipment.
He said use of the new rocket booster would permit more intensive studies
of space, including those that would allow a more thorough research of
the physical fields and internal structure of the Earth directly from space.
Such studies would be of primary interest for geophysics and geology, he
said.
On 29 July 1965,
TASS reported that Proton I was functioning normally.
On 6 August 1965,
TASS announced that U.S.S.R.’s 12.2-ton Proton I satellite was orbited
by a booster whose main engines were rated at thrust of more than 60-million
horsepower. Proton I marked “the beginning of a new phase in the exploration
and domestication of space.” It would study solar cosmic rays, spectrum
and composition of cosmic ray particles, nuclear interactions of galactic
origin, and galactic gamma rays.
Proton I had, for
the first time, trapped particles with energy of 100 trillion electron
volts and a measured energy spectrum of cosmic rays containing such particles,
Nikolai I. Grigorov, head of Cosmic Ray Laboratory at Moscow Univ. Institute
of Nuclear Physics, told Pravda on 21 August 1965. He said that precise
measurements of high-energy particles required the use of a heavy ionizing
calorimeter which could not have been orbited without the lifting capacity
of Russia’s new large rockets. Prof. Grigorov explained that high-energy
particles never reached Earth-bound registering devices because they were
absorbed and transformed as they collided with atoms of Earth’s atmosphere.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 5 August 1965, Harro Zimmer, chief of
a West Berlin satellite tracking station, said the U.S.S.R- had secretly
lauuched a second spacecraft wilh Proton July 16. The unannounced spacecraft,
said Zimmer, had been brought back to Earth, landing near Magnitogorsk.
k00 km north of the Aral Sea, between 3 a,m. and 3:25 a.m. (EDT) July 31. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's
Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 333, 338-9, 339, 343, 344, 355, 369, 371,
390, ;
National Space Science Data
Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p. 92 ; Gunter's
; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Ferret 8
Spacecraft: |
OPS 8411 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #90 ; 1965-055A ; 569th spacecraft,
1,447th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Electronic intelligence |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Zond 3
Spacecraft: |
3MV-4 No. 3 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #91 ; 1965-056A ; 570th spacecraft,
1,464th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
Launch: |
18 July 1965 at 14h38 UTC, from
Baikonu Cosmodrome's LC-1, by an A-2-e/"Molniya" (8K78). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Zond III automatic
space station was launched into a heliocentric orbit by U.S.S.R. from a
heavy artificial satellite placed in a parking orbit around the Earth by
a multi-stage carrier rocket, TASS announced. TASS said that the “trajectory
of the automatic station is close to the expected one,” that communications
were stable, and that all systems were functioning normally. The purpose
of the launch was to “check the station’s systems in conditions of prolonged
space flight and the holding of scientific studies in interplanetary space,”
TASS said. Pictures of the farside of the Moon taken by Zond III were later
released on 20 August 1965.
On 19 July 1965,
U.S.S.R. reported that Zond III had passed the 226,000-km mark in its flight
towards unspecified destination. Zond III was said to be functioning normally
and radioing scientific data back to Earth.
Zond III’s lunar
photography mission was announced by TASS: Automatic station Zond 3 is
continuing its flight along a heliocentric orbit… Photography of the Moon
began on July 20, 36 hrs. after launch, at 0424 hrs., Moscow time, when
the automatic station was at a distance of 11,600 km from the lunar surface,
and was concluded at 0532 hrs. at a distance of about 10,000 km. After
the lunar flyby, the station is continuing its motion in a heliocentric
orbit, becoming increasingly more distant from the Earth and the Sun. Image
transmission began in accordance with the program of July 29 at a distance
of 2.2 million km, when the angular size of the Earth was small enough
for the precise tuning of the on-board parabolic antenna towards the Earth.
“Zond 3 for the
first time photographed a part of the Moon that cannot be seen from the
Earth and which was not included in the photos made by the Soviet interplanetary
station in October 1959. At the moment photography began, the phase of
the Moon visible from Zond 3 was close to full moon, while when the photography
ended almost half of the lunar disc was in shadow. The first frames show
a considerable part of the Moon visible from the Earth. Later frames show
the surface of the Moon when there was considerable solar side illumination,
when the relief formations cast distinct shadows.
“The images from
Zond 3 are sent with a clarity of 1,100 lines. When photographing from
a distance of the order of 10,000 km, images of a lunar surface area of
about 5 million square km are possible. The quality of the photographs
obtained make it possible to see numerous details of the lunar relief,
which are of considerable interest. The photo obtained from Zond 3 will
be published in leading newspapers and scientific journals. To analyze
the result obtained and to name the craters, ranges, and other formations
on the newly photographed sections of the Moon, the Academy of Sciences
of the U.S.S.R. has set up a special commission.
“Scientific investigations
are continuing on Zond 3. For further testing of the radio line, the transmission
of photographs of the far side of the Moon from the station will continue
during subsequent communications sessions, right up to the greatest distance
from the earth. Thirty-eight communications sessions have been conducted
from Zond 3. All on-board systems are functioning normally.”
Zond III’s photographs of the hidden side
of the moon received editorial comment in the New York Times: “Scientists
and laymen from all nations will look forward to the pictures of the dark
side of the Moon that Moscow reports its Zond 3 satellite took last month.
Unitil then, the only photographic intelligence on the area had come from
the pictures an earlier Soviet satellite took in 1959, a time when the
available equipment -- and consequently the quality of the result -- was
primitive by present standards. Six years ago, the marvel was that this
feat could be accomplished at all. Now, in the wake of the photographic
knowledge of the moon and of Mars obtained by this country’s Ranger and
Mariner vehicles, world judgment of the importance of the Soviet accomplishment
will depend upon the quality and the quantity of the new knowledge it provides.”
On 23 August 1965, Yuri Khodarev, engineer
in the Soviet space program, revealed that Zond III had used photographic
film instead of magnetic film to record pictures for later playback. The
mission had been essentially a test in which the spacecraft would continue
to play back the Moon pictures repeatedly at increasingly greater distances
up to “hundreds of millions of kilometers,” Khodarev said, adding, “we
have created a new, compact photo television system intended for photographing
and transmission of images of planets under conditions of prolonged space
flight.” Zond III had taken 25 photos of the far side of the Moon
in little more than an hour. The moon photographs were as good as those
taken of the visible side from earth-based observatories: “They show beautiful
half-tone transitions, reflecting the character of detailed surface relief.”
The Zond III photographs confirmed earlier
conclusions concerning the scarcity of dark depressions on the moon’s reverse
side, but also revealed sea-like formations up to 500 km across and about
as long as the maria. These formations differed structurally from the maria
and lacked their characteristic dark color. The northern part of the side
of the moon was occupied by a bright elevation pitted with craters. Concentration
of craters throughout the reverse side of the Moon was high.
Mstislav V. Keldysh, President of the Soviet
Academy of Sciences, noted that the trajectory of Zond III had passed far
from the planets but said that “the experience we gained in launching this
probe into remote space will be used in subsequent launchings to photograph
the planets.” He said the U.S.S.R. had already begun preparations to achieve
a soft lunar landing. Experiments aboard the spacecraft were for study
of magnetic fields, solar wind, low-frequency radio emission of the galaxy,
micrometeors, cosmic rays, and the in frared and ultravioiet spectra of
the lunar surface.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 337, 339, 379-80, 380, 392-3, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
92 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Discoverer 93 / KH-4A
22 / CORONA 97
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1022 / CORONA J-22 / OPS
5543 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #92 ; 1965-057A ; 571st spacecraft,
1,457th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Vela Hotel 5 / Vela
3A
Spacecraft: |
OPS 6577 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #93 ; 1965-058A ; 572nd spacecraft,
1,458th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Nuclear explosion monitoring |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
20 July 1965 at 8h27 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral Air Force Base's LC-13, by an Atlas-Agena D (Atlas LV-3A
225D / Agena D 1803). |
Orbit: |
107,198.6 km x 115,942.5 km x
34.6° x 6,713 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: In a triple launch,
USAF launched two 238-km Vela Hotel (Sentry) satellites and ORS III-1 (Octahedron
research satellite) with an Atlas- Agena D booster. Expected to operate
six months, the Vela Hotel satellites were part of DOD'S Vela program to
monitor space for violations of the nuclear test-ban treaty.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
After 34 years without any tracking data,
the distant Earth satellite Vela 3A has been rediscovered in 2004. Rob
McNaught observed the object, and after preliminary identification as a
Vela satellite by Tony Beresford and others, Mike McCants clinched the
ID as Vela 3A with a detailed orbit propagation. The satellite was launched
in 1965 into a 106451 x 115635 km x 35.4° orbit. It was last seen in
1970 in a 84051 x 138704 km x 31.8° orbit, and is now in a 52730 x
172338 km x 38.9° orbit. In the meantime, numerical integration shows
its inclination has varied between 13 and 73 degrees due to solar perturbations. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 341, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; Jonathan
Space Report No. 525
; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p. 92 ; Gunter's
; Celestrak's Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Vela Hotel 6 / Vela
3B
Spacecraft: |
OPS 6564 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #94 ; 1965-058B ; 573rd spacecraft,
1,459th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Nuclear explosion monitoring |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
20 July 1965 at 8h27 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral Air Force Base's LC-13, by an Atlas-Agena D (Atlas LV-3A
225D / Agena D 1803). |
Orbit: |
101,790.6 km x 121,975.2 km x
34.8° x 6,716 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: In a triple launch,
USAF launched two 238-km Vela Hotel (Sentry) satellites and ORS III-1 (Octahedron
research satellite) with an Atlas- Agena D booster. Expected to operate
six months, the Vela Hotel satellites were part of DOD'S Vela program to
monitor space for violations of the nuclear test-ban treaty.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 341, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
92 ;
Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
ERS 17 / ORS 3
Spacecraft: |
Environmental Research Satellite
17 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #95 ; 1965-058C ; 574th spacecraft,
1,460th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Radiations studies |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 76
Spacecraft: |
DS-P1-Yu No. 3 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #96 ; 1965-059A ; 575th spacecraft,
1,474th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Military technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Pegasus 3
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #97 ; 1965-060A ; 576th spacecraft,
1,467th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorids studies |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
30 July 1965 at 13h00 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-37B, by a Saturn I (SA-10). |
Orbit: |
522.6 km x 541.9 km x 28.9°
x 95.5 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
4 August 1969. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: Pegasus III meteoroid
detection satellite was launched by a Saturn I booster, the last (SA-10)
in a series of ten launch vehicle test flights. Main assignment of the
1,450-kg spacecraft with wing-like panels was to add information on the
frequency of meteoroids in near-earth environment, for use in the design
of future manned and unmanned spacecraft. Eight of its detachable panels
carried 352 thermal surface samples collected from the aerospace industry.
If NASA should program an astronaut-Pegasus III rendezvous, the astronaut
would detach as many panels as possible and return them to Earth for study.
Pegasus III -- expected to return meteoroid data to ground stations for
at least one year -- was identical to Pegasus II.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
Pegasus C was equipped with small aluminum
sub-panels that, at some future date, an astronaut could, if desired, detach
and bring back to Earth. The panels would provide the first actual samples
of meteoroid impact and would have tested some 43 types of thermal coatings.
Pegasus C would be launched July 30, 1965, into a 535-km-altitude circular
orbit at 28.9° inclination, close to a nominal manned flight path,
rather than into an elliptical orbit like that of Pegasus I and II. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 319, 357-8, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
92 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Apollo BP 9A / Saturn
SA-10
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #98 ; 1965-0 ; 577th spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Piloted spacecraft test |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
30 July 1965 at 13h00 UTC, from
Cape Canaveral's LC-37B, by a Saturn I (SA-10). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: Also orbited with
Pegasus III was Apollo command and service module boilerplate (BP-9), which
served as shroud for Pegasus III. Apollo launch escape system was jettisoned
during launch vehicle’s ascent.
NASA’s seven-year
Saturn I program was concluded with the successful launch of Pegasus III.
It marked the tenth success in as many attempts for the Saturn I booster.
A significant development of the program was the clustering of several
large rocket engines: the power plant in the first stage of the Saturn
I was a cluster of eight H-1 engines each with 85 tons of thrust to give
this stage 685 tons of thrust. The first four flight tests (SA-1 through
SA-4) were with dummy upper stages; beginning with SA-5, both stages (S-I
and S-IV) were “live”; and the last three Saturn 1’s each orbited a Pegasus.
Other significant developments growing out of the Saturn I program included:
“1. First extensive
use of multi-engines (six RL-10-A3’s) and liquid hydrogen in the upper
stages.
“2. Advancement
of guidance and instrumentation technology.
“3. Facility expansion,
and development of new transportation modes for large rockets.
“4. Orbiting meteoroid
technology satellites, the largest instrumented satellites launched to
date.
“5. Developing the
capability of placing into Earth orbit payloads of more than 17 tons.
“6. Developing guidance
and instrumentation technology which could be used in other programs.”
Reviewing the results
of fhe successfuiiy cornpleizi: Saturn I rccket program, Bob Ward listed
in an article in the 3 August 1965 Huntsville Times eight major contributions
which the work had made to launch-vehicle and other aerospace technology:
(1) clustering of large rocket engines: a cluster of eight H-1 engines
forming the power plant of the booster’s 682-tons thrust first stage; (2)
first extensive use of multi-engine power plants and liquid hydrogen fuel
for upper stages; (3) advances in the fields of rocket guidance and instrumentation;
(4) expansion of facilities and development of new methods of transporting
large rocket stages, including special-purpose barges and aircraft; (5)
development of fabrication techniques needed for large rockets; (6) orbiting
meteoroid technology satellites-the three Pegasus orbiters were the largest
instrumented satellites yet launched; (7) proving the aerodynamics of the
Apollo spacecraft by orbiting five boilerplate versions of the command
and service modules; and (8) developing sufficient launching power to place
payloads of almost 20 tons into orbit around the earth -- the seventh Saturn
launch September 18, 1964, orbiting a 17.8 tons payload.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's 1965
Chronology ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 358, 365, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
92 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 77 / Zenit-4
#9
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 13 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #99 ; 1965-061A ; 578th spacecraft,
1,469th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
KH-7 21 / Gambit-1 21
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 21 / GAMBIT SV 971 /
OPS 5898 / AFP-206 [F21] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #100 ; 1965-062A ; 579th spacecraft,
1,471st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Hitchhiker 10
Spacecraft: |
OPS 6761 / [EHH B3] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #101 ; 1965-062B ; 580th spacecraft,
1,472nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Electronic intelligence |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Secord 5 / EGRS 5
Spacecraft: |
Sequential Collation of Range |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #102 ; 1965-063A ; 581st spacecraft,
1,506th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Geodesy |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Army |
|
|
|
.
SEV
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #103 ; 1965-063C ; 582nd spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
3 August 1965 at 19h12 UTC, from
Vandenberg Air Force Base's PALC-2-4, by an Atlas Agena D (Atlas 7102 /
Agena D). |
Orbit: |
1,130 km x 2,421 km x 69.23°
x 122 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
|
Mission: |
Historical reports: A Scout Evaluation
Vehicle (SEV) was successfully launched by NASA from Wallops Station. Primary
purpose of the mission was to demonstrate in flight the operation of improved
vehicle features: (1) use of new second- and fourth-stage rocket motors
with improved thrust characteristics; (2) test of Scout’s capability to
fly a “dogleg” course from Wallops Station by yaw torquing, performed during
the third-stage coasting period; (3) test of in-flight performance of improved
spin motors to stabilize the fourth stage of the vehicle; (4) demonstration
of the Scout air transportability concept by launching a vehicle which,
after complete assembly at Wallops, had been airlifted from and returned
to the launch site in simulation of a transcontinental trip. All flight
objectives were met, including injection of Army Corps of Engineers SECOR
V (Sequential Collation of Range) geodetic satellite into orbit. Elliptical
orbit should enable SECOR V to transmit measurements of distances up to
3,000 km - twice the distance possible with earlier Secor versions which
had been launched into 1,000-km circular orbits. The satellite would map
the surface of the earth, pinpointing the location of land bodies separated
by large expanses of ocean.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 373-4, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
93 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Surveyor SD-2 (AC-6
/ Atlas-Centaur 6)
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #104 ; 1965-064A ; 583rd spacecraft,
1,503rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
11 August 1965 at 14h31 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-36B, by an Atlas-Centaur (Atlas LV-3C AC-6 / Centaur
D 151D). |
Orbit: |
169.15 km x 820,824 km x 28.55°
x 31 days. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: NASA Atlas-Centaur
6 launched a dummy Surveyor spacecraft along a simulated lunar trajectory
in the fourth successful vehicle flight of six made to date. The Atlas
booster operated as planned; Centaur ignited, burning for 7 min. 12 sec.,
and injected the dummy Surveyor spacecraft into a highly elliptical simulated
lunar transfer orbit. Speed of injection into orbit was 38,135 km/h]. The
975 kg metal payload continued on a path toward a point 385,000 km from
Earth which would simulate a lunar transfer orbit. The target zone was
on the path the Moon follows as it orbits the earth.
The 35-m, 137 tons
launch vehicle produced 176 tons thrust at liftoff. The Centaur 2nd stage
was powered by two RL-10 liquid hydrogen-liquid oxygen engines with a thrust
of 7 tons each.
The AC-6 mission,
sixth in a series of eight scheduled Centaur development flights, was a
rehearsal for the AC-7 flight scheduled for later 1965 in which an engineering
model of Surveyor was to make a soft landing on the lunar surface. Flight
was designed to obtain data on several new Atlas-Centaur features and to
continue evaluation of other components and systems tested during previous
missions. Atlas-Centaur vehicle development for direct ascent missions
was complete, and the vehicle was now capable of supporting fully operational
Surveyor missions.
NASA said tracking
data indicated that less than one-tenth of the mid-course correction capability
in the Surveyor model payload would have been needed to put the spacecraft
on the final trajectory for a soft landing at a preselected site on the
moon. With the success of this mission, Centaur was first U.S. launch vehicle
to qualify operationally an all-inertial guidance system for deep space
application.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's
Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 374-5, 377, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
93 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Surcal / Porcupine 2
Spacecraft: |
SURCAL/Long Rod |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #105 ; 1965-065B or J ; 584th
spacecraft,
1,577th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Surveillance calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Surcal / Dodecapole
2
Spacecraft: |
Dodecahedron |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #106 ; 1965-065C ; 585th spacecraft,
1,510th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Surveillance calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Surcal / Tempsat 1
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #107 ; 1965-065E ; 586th spacecraft,
1,512nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Surveillance calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Transit-O 5 / NNS O-5
Spacecraft: |
Transit
5B-7 / OPS 8464 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #108 ; 1965-065F ; 587th spacecraft,
1,514th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Navigation |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Spasur Rod 1
Spacecraft: |
Navspasur Rod / Long Rod |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #109 ; 1965-065G ; 588th spacecraft,
1,515th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Surveillance calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Calsphere 4
Spacecraft: |
NRL PL 158? |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #110 ; 1965-065H ; 589th spacecraft,
1,520th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Surveillance calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Surcal 5
Spacecraft: |
NRL PL150C? |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #111 ; 1965-065K ; 590th spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Surveillance calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
|
|
.
Surcal
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #112 ; 1965-065L ; 591st spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Surveillance calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 78 / Zenit-2
#30
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-2 11F61 No. 30 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #113 ; 1965-066A ; 592nd spacecraft,
1,505th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Discoverer 94 / KH-4A
23 / CORONA 98
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1023 / CORONA J-23 / OPS
7208 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #114 ; 1965-067A ; 593rd spacecraft,
1,513th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Gemini 5 / Gemini V
Spacecraft: |
Gemini spacecraft 5 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #115 ; 1965-068A ; 594th spacecraft,
1,516th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Piloted spacecraft |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
21 August 1965 at 14h00 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-19, by a Titan 2 (GT-5). |
Orbit: |
Initial: 161.3 km x 347.4 km
x 32,6° x S9.58 min.
Later: 170.9 km x 347.4 km x 32,6° x
S9.58 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Recovered: |
21 August 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: On 19 August 1965,
Gemini V’s launch day, the countdown progress to T-10 minutes before it
was canceled and reset for August 21. Astronauts Gordon Cooper and Charles
Conrad, Jr., were disappointed, but took the delay in stride.
Five hours before
the scheduled launch, computer studies suggested that the liquid hydrogen
in the spacecraft’s fuel cells was boiling off too quickly. Engineers’
attempts to force additional liquid hydrogen into the fuel cells succeeded
only in hastening the escape of hydrogen gas. Finally, a colder liquid
hydrogen was used with success. As
Ten minutes before
lift-off, apparent troubles with a telemetry programmer caused another
hold in the countdown. During a thunderstorm, a lightning-induced power
surge affected the electrical instruments.
At 17:00 EDT, as
NASA officials were opening a press conference, they were informed that
a fire had broken out in a communications cable linking the Gemini V launch
complex with mission control center. The officials said that there was
a “very good possibility” that Gemini V could be launched on August 21,
but that no definite date could be set until a partial countdown was held
the next day to determine the damage caused by the power surge and the
cable fire.
On 20 August 1965,
NASA announced that Gemini V would be launched from Kennedy Space Center,
August 21, at 10:00, EDT. Problems which had collectively postponed the
launch on August 19, had been resolved: (1) the malfunctioning telemetry
programer had been replaced; (2) the underground communications cable had
been repaired; (3) the technique for loading the fuel cells with liquid
hydrogen had been perfected; (4) security police would take extra precautions
to prevent trespassing onto the launch area; and (5) the Gemini 5 computer,
which officials feared had been damaged by the lightning-induced power
surge, was functioning normally.
Gemini V spacecraft,
piloted by L. Gordon Cooper and Charles Conrad, Jr., was successfully launched
with two-stage Titan II booster on an eight-day mission (190 hr. 55 min.)
comprising 120 revolutions of the Earth. Flight objectives were: (1) demonstrate
and evaluate performance of the Gemini spacecraft; (2) evaluate performance
of the rendezvous guidance and navigation system using the Radar Evaluation
Pod (REP); and (3) evaluate effects of prolonged exposure to the space
environment of the two-man crew. As reported by the New York Times,
the eight days mission is roughly the time that woud be required for a
round trip to the moon. If Colonel Cooper and Commander Conrad can function
effectively in a state of weightlessness for that long and then return
without injury, they will have given strong support to the hypothesis on
which the whole program for a manned moonshot is based.
First stage of the
booster burned for 156.3 seconds. Second stage then separated, burned for
179.6 seconds. Traveling at 28,327 km/h, the 3,605-kg Gemini V was inserted
into orbit. Fifty-six minutes after liftoff, astronauts fired thruster
rockets to raise the perigee to 170.9 km in preparation for rendezvous
with REP, a practice maneuver to prepare for Gemini VI’s rendezvous in
orbit with an Agena stage. At beginning of 2nd orbit, astronauts ejected
REP from the adapter section behind the spacecraft. REP moved away at eight
kilometres per hour.
The astronauts carried
two one-dollar bills during the Gemini V mission to prove on landing that
they were the same spacemen who were launched, UPI reported. A representative
of the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale recorded
the serial numbers on the bills before the launch and would check them
after the landing.
About two hours
after insertion of Gemini V into orbit, oxygen pressure for the new fuel
cell dropped from 55 to 4 atmospheric pressure because of a failure in
the heater element circuitry. This pressure-drop severely reduced the fuel
cell's output of electrical power. The REP experiment was abandoned and
there was some apprehension as to whether the flight could continue.
At 27 hours, into
the flight, Cooper and Conrad successfully locked their spacecraft radar
on a spare REP transponder mounted on a tower at NASA Merritt Island Launch
Area during a six-minute pass. Oxygen pressure began building up in the
fuel cell system, and hopes of completing the mission were raised,
On 22 August, the
New
York Times commented on the malfunction of the fuel cell in the Gemini
V spacecraft launched August 21: “Past manned space flights have gone so
well in most respects that yesterday’s tension-filled hours were a shock
and a surprise. It has all seemed too easy to the millions of television
viewers who have observed previous man-in-space experiments. It was natural
to assume that once Gemini 5 was so successfully launched, all would once
again go more or less as planned. But those intimately involved with these
efforts have known all along of the numerous possibilities of trouble.
They were not greatly surprised that one of those possibilities for major
difficulty -- in this case a malfunction of the fuel cell on Gemini 5-turned
into reality.
“There will undoubtedly
be future emergencies in space. Yesterday’s events are a sobering reminder
that the effort to reach the moon during this decade is straining the limits
of available technology, and that serious risks are being taken. These
hazards are also faced, of course, by the Soviet manned space program.
The brave men both countries are sending into space would be the prime
beneficiaries of full Soviet-American cooperation that would pool both
countries’ knowledge and experience to minimize the dangers inherent in
these pioneering efforts.”
Dispatch to Moscow
from TASS’ New York correspondent, Leonid Ponomarev: “The flight of the
U.S. spaceship Gemini-5 … proceeded normally for only two hours, although
the flight program was calculated for eight days.
“The main reason
[was] that a new system for providing electric power… was being used in
the Gemini-5 spacecraft for the first time…
“It is a noteworthy
fact that the new system for providing electrical power has never once
been tested in spaceflight conditions. From the test stands on earth, the
installation was put directly into working conditions in space. There are
several reasons that explain this haste and a certain degree of risk. The
program chiefs were given the task of ‘catching up with the Soviet Union’
at any price regarding the length of flight in space. However, the present
power of U.S. rockets and the size of the astronauts’ capsule are utterly
inadequate for lifting and storing reliably tested battery-powered electrical
power installations, which would weigh more than the new system. U.S. scientists
were compelled to rapidly create a system, new in principle, in order to
provide power for the Gemini-5 spacecraft for eight days so that it could
fulfill its tasks.”
On August 23, as
Gemini V made its 32nd revolution around the Earth, the spacecraft began
a series of maneuvers to rendezvous with a simulated Agena upper stage
in lieu of the REP experiment. By the 34th orbit, Gemini V was only 26
km behind the simulated Agena, very close to the planned 24-km separation
NASA hoped to have on Gemini VI prior to final closing and docking maneuver.
Last maneuver was not attempted because of the need to conserve fuel on
Gemini V.
On August 24, astronauts
Cooper and Conrad twice spotted objects on the ground; they observed a
Minuteman ICBM launch from Vandenberg AFB, and tracked and photographed
it; they sighted a huge checkerboard design laid out on the ground near
Laredo, Tex., and reported direction in the which arrows in the center
of the blocks were pointed.
Soviet claim that
the Gemini V spaceflight was undertaken with “haste and definite risk”
received editorial comment in the August 24’s Washington Evening Star:
“Tass, the official Soviet news agency, should feel a little bit embarrassed
at the moment. It has given a big play to a story by Leonid Ponomariov
[sic], its New York correspondent. The story has charged that American
space officials have been ordered by the Johnson administration to ’beat
the Soviet Union at any price with regard to the duration of orbital flight.’
”… our country may
indeed be forging ahead. But nothing could be more ridiculous than Ponomariov’s
[sic] studied suggestion that Gemini 5 has been put into orbit in a slapdash
manner, with callous disregard for the safety of the astronauts aboard,
just to steal a space scene from the Soviets. The fuel system and everything
else aboard the Cooper-Conrad vehicle are not whimsical improvisations.
That has been made dramatically clear by the way in which Gemini’s initial
power failure has been eliminated with help from ground control, by the
craft’s built-in means of self-correction. As a result, it seems fairly
certain right now that Astronauts Cooper and Conrad will be able to complete
their eight-day mission…
On August 25, the
astronauts saw, tracked, and photographed another Minuteman ICBM fired
from Vandenberg AFB and identified a rocket sled test on Holloman AFB.
At request of U.S. Weather Bureau,, they attempted to photograph the eye
of tropical storm Doreen about 300 km south of Hawaii.
During the flight,
the astronauts both remained in good spirits. Sixteen of the planned
seventeen experiments were conducted. Despite the heavy work schedule,
Cooper and Conrad each slept about five hours a day. The astronauts ate
about 2,000 calories of food a day, less than the 2,900 calories prescribed
for the mission, and each drank three kilograms of water daily.
August 27 saw problems
with the steady accumulation of water in the fuel cell, which threatened
to exceed water-storage capacity; faulty attitude and maneuvering thrusters;
and the boiling off of hydrogen gas which caused the spacecraft to roll.
On August 28, the
fuel cell and the left thruster were functioning well. Conrad reported
seeing “a carrier and a destroyer steaming right into Jacksonville”; it
was actually a tug pulling a large barge.
On August 29, Cooper
and Conrad talked via radio with Astronaut M. Scott Carpenter, in Sealab
II on the floor of the Pacific off La Jolla, Calif.
Approach of Hurricane
Betsy from the coast of South America forced NASA officials to order Gemini
V to land one revc!ution early. Two more of Gemini V’s thrusters froze,
but there was still sufficient steering power to correct minor variations.
To begin reentry,
the astronauts fired four braking rockets as the spacecraft passed 1,100
km north of Hawaii. Reentry was normal. Gemini V splashed down into the
Atlantic at 8:56 EDT, 1,000 km east of Jacksonville, 145 km off target.
A human error in computing the elapsed time of flight caused the target
error.
Assisted from the
capsule by Navy frogmen 45 minutes after splashdown, the astronauts were
taken by helicopter to U.S.S. Lake Champlain for medical debriefing.
The Gemini V mission
established eight new world records: (1) longest manned space flight: 190
hrs., 55 min. (former record: 119 hrs., six min. held by U.S.S.R.); (2)
national man hours in space: 441 hrs., 24 min. (former record, 507 hrs.,
16 min. held by U.S.S.R.); (3) longest multi-manned space flight: 190 hrs.,
56 rnin. (former record, 97 hrs., 48 min. set by U.S.); (4) most revolutions
for a manned space flight: 120 (former record, 81, set by U.S.S.R.); (5)
most manned flights: 9 (former record held by U.S.S.R., 8); (6) first man
to make a second orbital flight: L. Gordon Cooper; (7) individual with
most space flight time: Col. Cooper; (8) individuals making the longest
single space flight: Cooper and Conrad (former record held by U.S.S.R.)
“I certainly have
seen nothing in the eight-day data that would lead me to be worried about
a 14-day flight,” Dr. Charles A. Berry, chief physician for the astronauts,
told reporters on 30 August 1965.é. He said that the astronauts
were in good physical condition and were returning to normal as quickly
as had the pilots of the four-day Gemini 4 flight. Changes in such indicators
as the heart rate and blood pressure characteristics seemed to reflect
adaptation to the weightless space environment and, later, to the stress
of returning to normal gravity of Earth, Dr. Berry explained. Heart rates
became lower in space and rose above normal on returning to Earth. At first,
on return to Earth, blood pressure did not respond as promptly as normal
to tilt-table tests designed to show how well the circulatory system copes
with sudden changes from horizontal to neariy-vertical posture. Cooper
and Conrad lost about 3½ and 4 kg respectively, but had gained most
of it back. This loss might have been a response to the space environment
but was believed to be partly water loss after reentry while waiting in
the sun to be rescued, Berry said. Both seemed to be less tired than their
predecessors.
Gemini V astronauts
had demonstrated during their flight that a manned weather satellite could
become a valuable part of Weather Bureau forecasting, Howard Simons reported
in the Washington Post, on 2 September 1965. U.S. weather
forecasters needed information on tropical storm Doreen moving through
the Pacific. Cooper and Conrad observed the storm and fixed its position,
acquiring the information earlier than TIRIS X meteorological satellite
and more precisely than a ship 250 km from the storm. The San Francisco
Weather Bureau Office had been able to combine Gemini V data with that
from TIROS X to prepare an advisory on Doreen.
At news conference
on 9 September 1965, Gordon Cooper and Charles Conrad recommended that,
in future flights, both pilots sleep at the same time; more rehydratable
foods be included in the diet; daily inflight exercises to compensate for
muscular inactivity of the legs be included; the crew travel without spacesuits
for greater comfort and flexibility; and that the training period be less
compressed. The astronauts agreed that stowage had been the main problem
throughout the flight. “Any small little item that was misplaced or wasn’t
placed in the proper location seemed to muhiply,” Cooper said. They had
seen “a great many micrometeorites, and one meteorite when it was reentering
the atmosphere down below us. And on any night side, during a very short
interval of time, you could see micrometeorites reentering.”
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 8 February 1965, NASA Manned Spacecraft
Center announced selection of Maj. L. Gordon Cooper (USAF) and Lt. Cdr.
Charles Conrad, Jr. (USN), to make the seven-day Gemini V space flight.
Gemini V would be the third manned Gemini space flight and would be made
in 1965. Backup crewmen were two civilians: Neil A. Armstrong and Elliot
M. See, Jr.
On 25 June 1965,
NASA Administrator James E. Webb announced that the Gemini V manned space
flight would be an eight-day mission, the time required to fly to the moon,
explore its surface, and return to earth.
On the 19 July 1965
press conference Gemini 5 astronauts Gordon Cooper, scheduled for launch
on August 19. explained that during the flight, he and Conrad would try
to sight a USN Polaris missile to be launched from the East Coast and an
unidentified missile to be launched from the West Coast. It was not disclosed
at what point during the mission either of the launches would occur. In
addition, Cooper said the astronauts would attempt to sight rocket engines
ignited on a rocket sled at Holloman AFB, N. Mex.
Also on the program
would be an attempt to rendezvous with a Rendezvous Evaluation Pod (REP)
which would be ejected from the spacecraft and would drift to a distance
of about 100 km from the spacecraft. The radar equipment onboard would
then assist in performing maneuvers to achieve rendezvous with the Pod,
although actual contact was not planned. Cooper said that backup
system for reentry would not be used again because the thrust fuel would
be used in the rendezvous experiment. No extravehicular activity would
be performed during this mission.
The astronauts announced
they would attempt to communicate with fellow astronaut Scott Carpenter
participating in the USN Sealab II experiment beneath the Pacific. Flight
plans called for a landing in the West Atlantic. Both astronauts felt that
personal hygiene would be one of the main problems of the flight.
On 30 July 1965,
DOD refused request by television networks to present live coverage of
the recovery portion of the Gemini V flight scheduled for Aug. 19. Equipment
necessary to set up a portable ground station on the aircraft carrier U.S.S.
Lake Champlain “might interfere with operational requirements and shipboard
communications,”
On 3 August 1965,
NASA still planned to launch an eight-day, 121-orbit, two-man Gemini V
flight August 19, but fuel cells were causing some problems. The cells’
oxygen and hydrogen tended to evaporate too quickly to keep the Gemini
spacecraft electrically “alive” for such a long trip, NASA spokesmen said. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 58, 297-8, 339-40, 360, 365, 385, 386,
387-9, 391, 394, 395, 403-4, 405, 412, 421, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
93 ;
Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
REP
Spacecraft: |
Rendezvous Evaluation Pod |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #116 ; 1965-068C ; 595th spacecraft,
1,518th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
21 August 1965 at 14h00 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-19, by a Titan 2 (GT-5). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
27 August 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: x
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Noes: |
The radar set that would guide Gemini astronauts
on rendezvous missions in space, beginning with the August 19 Gemini V
flight, was demonstrated on 7 Julye 1965 by Westinghouse Corp., working
under an $18 million contrart with NASA. Astronauts L. Gordon Cooper
and Charles Conrad would carry a self-contained Rendezvous Evaluation Pod
(REP) into orbit on the back end of their spacecraft. An Agena rendezvous
radar transponder and flashing beacons would be packaged in the REP along
with batteries and antenna. Midway through the second revolution, at 2
hrs. 25 min. after liftoff, command pilot Cooper would yaw the Gemini 5
spacecraft 90° to the right. Explosive charges would eject the REP
from its canister northward at 4.5 km/h. Gemini 5 would then maneuver away
from the REP to attain a position 10 kilometres below and 23 km behind
the REP. Subsequent phase adjustment would place Gemini 5 in a co-elliptical
orbit - that is, the spacecraft would be at constant altitude below the
REP but reducing the trailing distance. since the spacecraft in its lowest
orbit, it would be traveling faster than the REP. Range and range-rate
data would be displayed to the Gemini 5 crew by the rendezvous radar system.
The radar system would continuously compute distance and angles from the
spacecraft to the Pod, and calculate the maneuvers necessary to effect
rendezvous. At five hours and 36 min. after liftoff, if the mission went
as planned, Gemini 5 should be closing in on the REP just north of the
Carnarvon, Australia, tracking station. Gemini 5 would not physically dock
with REP; the experiment would simply provide training for Gemini VI and
other rendezvous missions and evaluate the rendezvous radar hardware to
be used on the Agena target vehicle in later missions. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 317-8, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
93 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 79 / Zenit-4
#10
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 7 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #117 ; 1965-069A ; 596th spacecraft,
1,523th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
OSO C
Spacecraft: |
S 57 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #118 ; 1965 10th loss ; 597th
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Solar observatory |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
25 August 1965 at 15h17 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-17B, by a Delta DSV-3C (Thor Delta C 434 / Delta
33). |
Orbit: |
N/a |
Destroyed: |
25 August 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: OSC-C was launched
with a Delta booster but fell into the south Atlantic Ocean after failing
to achieve orbit. First two stages of the launch vehicle performed perfectly:
following second stage cut-off and an approximate 7-minute coast period,
small rockets mounted on a table between the second and third stage ignited
and spun the table up to 120 rpm; second stage separated, but the third
stage ignited about 514 seconds prematurely, was not properly aimed, and
did not attain orbital speed.
OSO-C was third in a series
of eight orbiting solar observatories planned by NASA. First two satellites
were launched on 7 March 1962 and 2 February1965. OSO I had provided more
than 2,000 hours of scientific information during its lifetime; OSO II
was still operating. The Orbiting Solar Observatory program was designed
to advance understanding of the Sun’s structure and behavior and to determine
the physical processes by which the Sun influences the Earth. Next Os0
launch would occur in mid-1966.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 30 May 1965, a solar eclipse of unusually
long duration will occur, and . every effort was made to launch OSO-C prior
to this event, so that two OSO’s, with complementary payloads, can be operating
and transmitting unique data on the solar radiation at the time of the
eclipse. [Unfortunately, this effort failed.] |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 126, 396-7, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
93 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Starad 2
Spacecraft: |
OPS 3373 / FTV 1602 / Starfish
Radiation 2 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #119 ; 1965 11th loss ; 598th
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Radiations studies |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 80
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #120 ; 1965-070A ; 599th spacecraft,
1,570th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
3 September 1965 at 13h55 UTC,
from Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-41, by a Kosmos C-1 (65S3). |
Orbit: |
1,356 km x 1,552 km x 56°
x 115 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
Cosmos LXXX, LXXXI, LXXXII, LXXXIII, and LXXXIV into orbit with a single
booster. One of the satellites was powered by a radioactive isotope, but
TASS announced that full measures had been taken “to preclude the possibility
of the radioactive isotope contaminating the atmosphere or the surface
of the earth.” All onboard equipment was functioning normally.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 413, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
93 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 81
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #121 ; 1965-070B ; 600th spacecraft,
1,591st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
3 September 1965 at 13h55 UTC,
from Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-41, by a Kosmos C-1 (65S3). |
Orbit: |
1,385 km x 1,556 km x 56°
x 115 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
Cosmos LXXX, LXXXI, LXXXII, LXXXIII, and LXXXIV into orbit with a single
booster. One of the satellites was powered by a radioactive isotope, but
TASS announced that full measures had been taken “to preclude the possibility
of the radioactive isotope contaminating the atmosphere or the surface
of the earth.” All onboard equipment was functioning normally.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 413, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
93 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 82
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #122 ; 1965-070C ; 601st spacecraft,
1,572nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
3 September 1965 at 13h55 UTC,
from Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-41, by a Kosmos C-1 (65S3). |
Orbit: |
1,410 km s 1,563 km x 56°
x 115 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
Cosmos LXXX, LXXXI, LXXXII, LXXXIII, and LXXXIV into orbit with a single
booster. One of the satellites was powered by a radioactive isotope, but
TASS announced that full measures had been taken “to preclude the possibility
of the radioactive isotope contaminating the atmosphere or the surface
of the earth.” All onboard equipment was functioning normally.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 413, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
93 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 83
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #123 ; 1965-070D ; 602nd spacecraft,
1,573rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
3 September 1965 at 13h55 UTC,
from Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-41, by a Kosmos C-1 (65S3). |
Orbit: |
1,438 km x 1,569 km x 56°
116 min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
Cosmos LXXX, LXXXI, LXXXII, LXXXIII, and LXXXIV into orbit with a single
booster. One of the satellites was powered by a radioactive isotope, but
TASS announced that full measures had been taken “to preclude the possibility
of the radioactive isotope contaminating the atmosphere or the surface
of the earth.” All onboard equipment was functioning normally.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 413, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
94 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 84
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #124 ; 1965-070E ; 603rd spacecraft,
1,574th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
3 September 1965 at 13h55 UTC,
from Baykonur Cosmodrome's LC-41, by a Kosmos C-1 (65S3). |
Orbit: |
1,467 km x 1,574 km x 56°
x 116 min |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: U.S.S.R. launched
Cosmos LXXX, LXXXI, LXXXII, LXXXIII, and LXXXIV into orbit with a single
booster. One of the satellites was powered by a radioactive isotope, but
TASS announced that full measures had been taken “to preclude the possibility
of the radioactive isotope contaminating the atmosphere or the surface
of the earth.” All onboard equipment was functioning normally.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 413, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
94 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
Kosmos 85 /
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 8 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #125 ; 1965-071A ; 604th spacecraft,
1,576th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
P-35-13 / DAPP 13
Spacecraft: |
OPS 8068 / DMSP-Block-4A F4
Data Acquisition and Processing Program
Defense Meteorological Satellite Program |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #126 ; 1965-072A ; 605th spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 86
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #127 ; 1965-073A ; 606th spacecraft,
1,584th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 87
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #128 ; 1965-073B ; 607th spacecraft,
1,585th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 88
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #129 ; 1965-073C ; 608th spacecraft,
1,586th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 89
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #130 ; 1965-074D ; 609th spacecraft,
1,587th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 90
Spacecraft: |
Strela-1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #131 ; 1965-075E ; 610th spacecraft,
1,588th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Discoverer 95 / KH-4A
24 / CORONA 100
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1024 / CORONA J-24 / OPS
7221 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #132 ; 1965-074A ; 611th spacecraft,
1,602nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 91 / Zenit-4
#12
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 9 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #133 ; 1965-075A ; 612th spacecraft,
1,603rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
KH-7 22 / Gambit-1 22
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 22 / GAMBIT SV 972 /
OPS 7208 ; AFP-206 [F22] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #134 ; 1965-076A ; 613th spacecraft,
1,609th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Luna 7
Spacecraft: |
E-6 No. 11 SA |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #135 ; 1965-077A ; 614th spacecraft,
1,610th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
|
.
OV 1-2 / OV1-2S
Spacecraft: |
Orbiting Vehicle 1-2 / SATAR |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #136 ; 1965-078A ; 615th spacecraft,
1,613th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
OV1 Dummy
Spacecraft: |
USAF OAR |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #137 ; 1965-078 ; 616th spacecraft,
th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
KH-4A 1025 / CORONA
JX-28 / OPS 5325
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1025 / CORONA JX-28 / OPS
5325 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #138 ; 1965-079A ; 617th spacecraft,
1,615th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
OGO-2 / POGO 1
Spacecraft: |
OGO C / S-50 ; Orbiting Geophysical
Observatory |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #139 ; 1965-081A ; 618th spacecraft,
1,620th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Earth upper atmosphere studies |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
|
.
Molniya 1-2
Spacecraft: |
Molniya 1B |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #140 ; 1965-080A ; 619th spacecraft,
1,621stt space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union |
|
|
|
.
LCS 2 (Transtage 4)
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #141 ; 1965-082A ; 620th spacecraft,
1,641st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Calibration |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
Launch: |
15 October 1965 at 17h23 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral Air Force Base's LC-40, by a Titan 3C (3C-4). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
Still in orbit. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: x
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
In July 1964, it was reported that nine payloads
had been chosen for flight aboard the research and development launchs
of the USAF Titan III. Five of the experiments were said to be experimental
communications satellites built by the MIT Lincoln Laboratory, and the
sixth a backup communications satellite from Lincoln Lab. The remaining
three were scientific satellites using the modified Arents spacecraft shell.
To avoid confusion with the defunct Arents program, the latter spacecraft
were to be called Orbiting Vehicle 2 (OV-2). |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics, 1964, p. 269 ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
94 ;
Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
OV 2-1
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #142 ; 1965-082A ; 621st spacecraft,
1,621st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 92 / Zenit-4
#13
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 16 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #143 ; 1965-083A ; 622nd spacecraft,
1,626th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 93
Spacecraft: |
DS-U2-V No. 1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #144 ; 1965-084A ; 623rd spacecraft,
1,629th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Military technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
GATV 6 / TDA-2
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #145 ; 1965 12th loss ; 624th
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Piloted spacecraft rendezvous target |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
25 October 1965 at 15h00 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-14, by an Atlas-Agena D (Atlas SLV-3 5301 / Agena
D 5002). |
Orbit: |
N/a |
Destroyed: |
25 October 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: On 20 Jauary 1965,
Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. conducted successful static firings of
the Agena target vehicle for Project Gemini. The firing tests, which included
simulated maneuvers to be made by Agena during rendezvous with the Gemini
spacecraft, included five separate firings of the main engine and of the
secondary propulsion system. The tests lasted some 12 hrs. and were termed
by Lockheed “complete captive flight.” All systems of the actual flight
Agena were tested, including command from earth, transmitters, programmed
commands with the Agena, telemetry, and docking simulation.
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 23, ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
94 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
..
Gemini VI
|
On 25 October 1965, the Gemini VI mission
(the first rendez-vous attempt with an orbital vehicle) was cancelled when
the Agena target was destroyed before reaching orbit. The mission than
became Gemini VI-A, was launched in December 1965 and make a rendezvous
with Gemini VII.
On 5 April 1965, it was announcement that
astronauts Walter M. Schirra, Jr. and Thomas P. Stafford had been selected
for the first Gemini docking and rendezvous mission, scheduled for launch
“the first quarter of 1966.” Virgil Grissom and John Young would be the
backup crew.
Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 23, ; |
|
.
Kosmos 94 / Zenit-4
#14
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-4 s/n 15 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #146 ; 1965-085A ; 625th spacecraft,
1,636th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Discoverer 97 / KH-4A
26 / CORONA 102
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1026 / CORONA J-25 / OPS
2155 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #147 ; 1965-086A ; 626th spacecraft,
1,637th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Proton 2
Spacecraft: |
N-4 No. 2 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #148 ; 1965-087A ; 627th spacecraft,
1,701st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Earth upper atmosphere studies |
Sponsor: |
Societ Union |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 95
Spacecraft: |
DS-U2-V No. 2 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #149 ; 1965-088A ; 628th spacecraft,
1,706th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Military technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Explorer 29 / GEOS 1
Spacecraft: |
GEOS A ; Geodetic Earth Orbiting
Satellite |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #150 ; 1965-089A ; 629th spacecraft,
1,726th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Geodesy |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
|
.
KH-7 23 / Gambit-1 23
Spacecraft: |
KH-7 no. 23 / GAMBIT SV 973 /
OPS 6232 / AFP-206 [F23] |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #151 ; 1965-090A ; 630th spacecraft,
1,727th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Agena Pickaback
Spacecraft: |
OPS 6232 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #152 ; 1965-090B ; 631st spacecraft,
1,728th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Electronic intelligence? |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Venera 2
Spacecraft: |
3MV-4 No. 4 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #153 ; 1965-091A ; 632rd spacecraft,
1,730th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Venus probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
|
.
Venera 3
Spacecraft: |
3MV-3 No. 1 SA |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #154 ; 1965-092A ; 633nd spacecraft,
1,733rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Venus probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
|
.
Explorer 30 / SOLRAD
8
Spacecraft: |
SE-A / Solar Explorer A |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #155 ; 1965-093A ; 634th spacecraft,
1,738th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Solar radiation monitoring |
Sponsor: |
NASA/U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 96
Spacecraft: |
3MV-4 No. 6 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #156 ; 1965-094A ; 635th spacecraft,
1,742nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Venus probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 97
Spacecraft: |
DS-U2-M No. 1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #157 ; 1965-095A ; 636th spacecraft,
1,777th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Military technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union |
|
|
|
.
A-1 / Asterix
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #158 ; 1965-096A ; 637th spacecraft,
1,778th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
France |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 98 / Zenit-2
#31
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-2 11F61 No. 31 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #159 ; 1965-097A ; 638th spacecraft,
1,780th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union'd Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Alouette 2
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #160 ; 1965-098A ; 639th spacecraft,
1,804th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Earth upper atmosphere studies |
Sponsor: |
Canada |
|
|
|
.
Explorer 31 / DME-A
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #161 ; 1965-098B ; 640th spacecraft,
1,806th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Earth upper atmosphere studies |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
|
.
Luna 8
Spacecraft: |
E-6 No. 11 SA |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #162 ; 1965-099A ; 641st spacecraft,
1,810th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Lunar probe |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union (Korolev's Design Bureau) |
|
|
|
.
Gemini 7
Spacecraft: |
Gemini spacecraft 7 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #163 ; 1965-100A ; 642nd spacecraft,
1,812nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Piloted spacecraft |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
4 December 1965 at 19h30 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-19, by a Titan 2 (GT-7). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Recovered: |
18 December 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: x
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 1st Julye 1965, NASA announced that
Frank Borman and James Lowell had been assigned as the prime flight crew
for the Gemini 7 mission scheduled for the first quarter of 1966. Backup
crew for the flight, which would last up to 14 days, would be Edward White
and Michael Collins. Borman and Lovell had been the backup crew and White
the pilot for Gemini IV. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 308 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
95 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965; |
|
|
.
FR 1
Spacecraft: |
"France 1" |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #164 ; 1965-101A ; 643rd spacecraft,
1,814th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Earth upper atmosphere studies |
Sponsor: |
France |
|
|
|
.
Discoverer
98 / KH-4A 27 / CORONA 103
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1027 / CORONA JX-27 / OPS
7249 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #165 ; 1965-102A ; 644th spacecraft,
1,86th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 99 / Zenit-2
#32
Spacecraft: |
Zenit-2 11F61 No. 32 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #166 ; 1965-103A ; 645th spacecraft,
1,817th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Gemini VI-A
Spacecraft: |
Gemini spacecraft 6 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #167 ; 1965-104A ; 646th spacecraft,
1,839th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Piloted spacecraft |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
Launch: |
15 December 1965 at 13h37 UTC,
from Cape Canaveral's LC-19, by a Titan 2 (GT-6). |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Recovered: |
16 December 1965. |
Mission: |
Historical reports: x
* * * * *
Current overview: x |
Notes: |
On 17 May 1965, Aviation Week reported taht
“NASA is considering the possibility of launching two manned Gemini spacecraft
within a few days of each other so that the two would operate concurrently
in space for a day or two.” Noting that the plan was not yet approved,
the item speculated that such action would probably not take place until
late in the Gemini program. Since only one Gemini launch stand existed,
it was most likely that the second vehicle would be erected and checked
out first, then stored until the first had flown. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica ; Astronautics
and Aeronautics 1965, p. 234-5 ; National
Space Science Data Center's ; TRW Space Log 1996 (Vol. 32), p.
96 ; Gunter's ; Celestrak's
Satcat=1965
; |
|
|
.
OGCh 01L
Spacecraft: |
OGCh No. 01L |
Numbers: |
1965 payload 168 ; suborbital ; 647th spacecraft. |
Type: |
Fractional Orbital Bombardment System |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
Launch: |
16 December 1965, from Baykonur
Cosmodrome's LC-67/21, by a R-36-0. |
Orbit: |
km x km x ° x
min. |
A&A |
km x km x ° x min. |
ESAM |
km x km x ° x min. |
USCSP |
km x km x ° x min. |
TRW |
km x km x ° x min. |
Wade |
|
Decayed: |
16 December 1965 |
Mission: |
Historical reports: x
* * * * *
Current overview: First suborbital test
of the FOBS system. Impacted within specification CEP in target zone. |
Source: |
Jonathan
McDowell's
Master
List ; Mark
Wade’s Encyclopedia Astronautica's R-36-0
; |
|
|
.
Pioneer 6
Spacecraft: |
Pioneer A |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #169 ; 1965-105A ; 648th spacecraft,
1,841st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Interplanetary environment studies |
Sponsor: |
NASA |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 100
Spacecraft: |
Meteor No. 3 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #170 ; 1965-106A ; 649th spacecraft,
1,843rd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Meteorology |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 101
Spacecraft: |
DS-P1-Yu No. 4 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #171 ; 1965-107A ; 650th spacecraft,
1,846th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Military technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
OV 2-3 (Transtage 8)
Spacecraft: |
|
Numbers: |
1965 payload #172 ; 1965-108A ; 651st spacecraft,
1,912th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Technology |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
LES 3
Spacecraft: |
Lincoln Experimental Satellite |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #173 ; 1965-108D ; 652nd spacecraft,
1,941st space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (technology) |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
OSCAR IV
Spacecraft: |
Orbiting Satellites Carrying
Amateur Radio |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #174 ; 1965-108C ; 653rd spacecraft,
1,902nd space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (amsat) |
Sponsor: |
Californian radio-amateurs |
|
|
|
.
LES 4
Spacecraft: |
Lincoln Experimental Satellite |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #175 ; 1965-108B ; 654th spacecraft,
1,870th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (technology) |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Air Force |
|
|
|
.
Transit 10 / NNS O-6
Spacecraft: |
OPS 1509 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #176 ; 1965-109A ; 655th spacecraft,
1,864th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Navigation |
Sponsor: |
U.S. Navy |
|
|
|
.
Discoverer 99 / KH-4A
28 / CORONA 104
Spacecraft: |
KH-4A 1028 / CORONA J-26 / OPS
4639 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #177 ; 1965-110A ; 656th spacecraft,
1,866th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Reconnaissance |
Sponsor: |
U.S. National Reconnaissance Office |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 102
Spacecraft: |
US-A |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #178 ; 1965-111A ; 657th spacecraft,
1,867th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Ocean surveillance ("RORSAT") |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos
Spacecraft: |
DS-K-40 No. 1 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #179 ; 1965 13th loss ; 658th
spacecraft. |
Type: |
Military technologies |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union |
|
|
|
.
Kosmos 103
Spacecraft: |
Strela-2 |
Numbers: |
1965 payload #180 ; 1965-112A ; 659th spacecraft,
1,868th space object catalogued. |
Type: |
Communications (store/dump) |
Sponsor: |
Soviet Union's Defense ministry |
|
|
|
|